Skip to content

UVA-adaptive, added Wyoming and DC#10

Merged
LucieContamin merged 2 commits intomidas-network:mainfrom
NSSAC:main
May 12, 2025
Merged

UVA-adaptive, added Wyoming and DC#10
LucieContamin merged 2 commits intomidas-network:mainfrom
NSSAC:main

Conversation

@hokinus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hokinus hokinus commented May 12, 2025

Added the previously missing Wyoming (56) and DC (11) and updates national trajectories.

@LucieContamin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @hokinus ,

Just for information, I cancelled the automatic validation and will send the output manually. The automatic validation will take a long time if your fork repo is not up to date. To avoid that issue, I will run the validation manually.

Please let me know if any issues or questions,
Best, Lucie

@LucieContamin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Here the validation output:

Run validation on files: 2025-04-27-UVA-adaptive.gz.parquet

ℹ: [pairing_info]: Run grouping pairing: scenario_id, location, target, horizon, age_group; No stochasticity. Number of Samples: 100
❗: [req_vals]: Task ID/output type/output_type_id combinations missing.

origin_date: 2025-04-27;
scenario_id: c("A-2025-04-01", "B-2025-04-01", "C-2025-04-01", "D-2025-04-01", "E-2025-04-01");
location: c("US", "11", "56");
target: inc hosp;
horizon: 52;
age_group: c("0-130", "65-130", "0-64");
output_type: quantile;
output_type_id: c("0.01", "0.025", "0.05", "0.1", "0.15", "0.2", "0.25", "0.3", "0.35", "0.4", "0.45", "0.5", "0.55", "0.6", "0.65", "0.7", "0.75", "0.8", "0.85", "0.9", "0.95", "0.975", "0.99")
❗: [value_col_valid]: Values in column value are not all valid with respect to modeling task config.
Value NA cannot be coerced to expected data type "double" for output type "sample".Values in column value are not all valid with respect to modeling task config.
Value -2 is smaller than allowed minimum value 0 for output type "sample".
🚫: [na_value]: value contains NA value.

❗: [flat_projection]: Some projections have a unique value for the whole projection period.
Please verify, for example: 2025-04-27, E-2025-04-01, 44, inc death, 0-64, quantile, 0.01; 2025-04-27, E-2025-04-01, 44, inc death, 0-64, quantile, 0.025; NA; NA; NA

@LucieContamin LucieContamin self-requested a review May 12, 2025 15:14
@LucieContamin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Here the validation output:

Run validation on files: 2025-04-27-UVA-adaptive.gz.parquet
ℹ: [pairing_info]: Run grouping pairing: scenario_id, location, target, horizon, age_group; No stochasticity. Number of Samples: 100
❗: [flat_projection]: Some projections have a unique value for the whole projection period.
Please verify, for example: 2025-04-27, E-2025-04-01, 44, inc death, 0-64, quantile, 0.01; 2025-04-27, E-2025-04-01, 44, inc death, 0-64, quantile, 0.025; NA; NA; NA

@LucieContamin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As the pairing and the warning has been validated before, I will merge the PR.

Thank you very much for the update

@LucieContamin LucieContamin merged commit a870c04 into midas-network:main May 12, 2025
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants