Skip to content

Conversation

@wpbonelli
Copy link
Member

close #2647, correcting initial buggy implementation of #2270

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 9, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 36.1%. Comparing base (556c088) to head (d600c95).
⚠️ Report is 89 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #2648      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage     55.5%   36.1%   -19.5%     
==========================================
  Files          644     360     -284     
  Lines       124135   65486   -58649     
==========================================
- Hits         68947   23641   -45306     
+ Misses       55188   41845   -13343     

see 550 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

"""
out = np.ma.zeros(self.nnodes, dtype=np.float32)
out = np.ma.zeros(self.nnodes, dtype=data["q"].dtype)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unrelated fix to avoid unwanted rounding in the full3D code path

spd = getattr(self, "stress_period_data")
if isinstance(item, MfList):
if not isinstance(item, list) and not isinstance(item, tuple):
if not isinstance(item, (list, tuple)):
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unrelated opportunistic simplification

[(layer, row, column), (layer, row, column), ...]. The layer,
row, and column values must be zero based.
idx : int, tuple of ints, or list of such
Acceptable values depend on grid type:
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Described required syntax for each grid type as requested. But I tentatively reworked this to accept a properly-shaped tuple for the grid type. Having to pass a 3-tuple with dummy values was very awkward and I'm tempted to call this a fix even though it's a breaking change. I don't know of anywhere else this is done that way. Wondering how others feel about this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: issues with get_ts support for aux vars

1 participant