Skip to content

test(NODE-6920): esm bundles do not have top-level await #790

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 24, 2025

Conversation

nbbeeken
Copy link
Contributor

Description

What is changing?

This PR is based on the changes in #749 it just adds the remaining testing and bundle renaming we need to finalize the change.

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

What is the motivation for this change?

Check that we don't reintroduce a TLA in the browser or node bundle

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@nbbeeken nbbeeken requested a review from a team as a code owner April 22, 2025 17:53
@nbbeeken nbbeeken force-pushed the NODE-6920-import branch 2 times, most recently from 5e885a7 to 0865dbb Compare April 22, 2025 18:07
Copy link
Contributor

@baileympearson baileympearson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I only reviewed the last two commits in the PR (the new tests). LGTM.

Once the other PR merges, I'll re-review and we can merge.

@baileympearson baileympearson self-assigned this Apr 23, 2025
@baileympearson baileympearson added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label Apr 23, 2025
@nbbeeken
Copy link
Contributor Author

@baileympearson feel free to merge the other PR and then this one

@baileympearson
Copy link
Contributor

@nbbeeken I haven't reviewed (and wasn't planning on reviewing) the other PR. Do you need me to?

@nbbeeken
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think it's worth the knowledge share, yes, please review it

@baileympearson baileympearson merged commit 7f2a6d3 into main Apr 24, 2025
8 checks passed
@baileympearson baileympearson deleted the NODE-6920-import branch April 24, 2025 19:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants