MOSU test: TestServer Whitelist 적용 #248
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @wlgns12370, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've implemented changes to apply a whitelist to the TestServer, primarily by expanding the set of publicly accessible API endpoints. This involves adding new paths to the global Whitelist configuration and concurrently removing specific authorization requirements from corresponding controller methods, ensuring that these designated endpoints can be accessed without prior authentication.
Highlights
- Whitelist Expansion: I've expanded the Whitelist enum to include several new API endpoints, such as /api/v1/s3 for file operations, various user-related checks (/api/v1/user/check-id, /api/v1/user/customer-key, /api/v1/user/me/find-id, /api/v1/user/me/find-password), and several exam-related endpoints (/api/v1/exam, /api/v1/exam/areas, /api/v1/exam/all). This allows these specific paths to bypass authentication/authorization filters.
- Exam API Accessibility: I've modified the ExamController by removing @PreAuthorize annotations from the getExams(), getByArea(), and getDistinctAreas() methods. This change makes these exam-related API endpoints publicly accessible without requiring user authentication or specific roles (like ADMIN or USER), aligning with their inclusion in the whitelist.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds several new endpoints to the security whitelist. However, the changes introduce multiple compilation errors because trailing commas are missing on the new enum constants. My review provides fixes for these critical issues. I've also included suggestions to correct the whitelist paths for exam-related endpoints and to improve the organization of the whitelist entries for better maintainability. The changes to ExamController are consistent with the whitelisting intent.
| USER_ID_CHECK("/api/v1/user/check-id", WhitelistMethod.GET), | ||
| CUSTOMER_KEY_CHECK("/api/v1/user/customer-key", WhitelistMethod.GET), | ||
| EXAM("/api/v1/exam", WhitelistMethod.GET), | ||
| EXAM_AREAS("/api/v1/exam/areas", WhitelistMethod.GET), | ||
| EXAM_ALL("/api/v1/exam/all", WhitelistMethod.GET), | ||
|
|
||
| //USER find-id | ||
| USER_FIND_ID("/api/v1/user/me/find-id", WhitelistMethod.POST), | ||
| //USER find-password | ||
| USER_FIND_PASSWORD("/api/v1/user/me/find-password", WhitelistMethod.POST), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All the newly added enum constants in this block are missing a trailing comma, which will cause a compilation error.
Additionally, there are a few areas for improvement:
- The paths for exam-related endpoints are incorrect and can be simplified. The
ExamControlleris mapped to/exams(plural), so the whitelist path should reflect that. A single entry for/api/v1/examsis sufficient. - The user-related endpoints can be grouped under a single descriptive comment for better organization and consistency.
| USER_ID_CHECK("/api/v1/user/check-id", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| CUSTOMER_KEY_CHECK("/api/v1/user/customer-key", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| EXAM("/api/v1/exam", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| EXAM_AREAS("/api/v1/exam/areas", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| EXAM_ALL("/api/v1/exam/all", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| //USER find-id | |
| USER_FIND_ID("/api/v1/user/me/find-id", WhitelistMethod.POST), | |
| //USER find-password | |
| USER_FIND_PASSWORD("/api/v1/user/me/find-password", WhitelistMethod.POST), | |
| USER_ID_CHECK("/api/v1/user/check-id", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| CUSTOMER_KEY_CHECK("/api/v1/user/customer-key", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| EXAM("/api/v1/exams", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| // 사용자 계정 관련 | |
| USER_FIND_ID("/api/v1/user/me/find-id", WhitelistMethod.POST), | |
| USER_FIND_PASSWORD("/api/v1/user/me/find-password", WhitelistMethod.POST), |
✨ 구현한 기능