Skip to content

Only remove pr labels if checkbox is explicitly unchecked#1870

Merged
shaunagm merged 2 commits into
move-coop:mainfrom
bmos:patch-2
May 27, 2026
Merged

Only remove pr labels if checkbox is explicitly unchecked#1870
shaunagm merged 2 commits into
move-coop:mainfrom
bmos:patch-2

Conversation

@bmos

@bmos bmos commented May 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What is this change?

  • Do not remove labels if checkbox is not present

Considerations for discussion

How to test the changes (if needed)

  • It has to be merged, as the label check workflow runs based on the workflow on main

Breaking Changes

Breaking changes are changes to our public API which may require existing users to change their code. If there are no breaking changes, any existing parsons user should not need to do anything after updating their parsons version.

Does this PR introduce breaking changes?
  • label: Breaking change — This PR introduces one or more breaking changes.
  • label: Non-breaking change — This PR does not introduce one or more breaking changes.

Details (if needed)

  • (List out any changes to the API that may cause breaks for developer implementation.)

@github-actions github-actions Bot added github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code non-breaking-change Status - Indicates that the code in this PR does not have any breaking changes. labels May 21, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage report

This PR does not seem to contain any modification to coverable code.

@shaunagm shaunagm merged commit 6d17bc8 into move-coop:main May 27, 2026
88 checks passed
@bmos bmos deleted the patch-2 branch May 27, 2026 20:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code non-breaking-change Status - Indicates that the code in this PR does not have any breaking changes.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants