[review] MIP-54: The Biarritz Model#54
Conversation
| @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ | |||
| # MIP-54: The Biarritz Model | |||
| - **Description**: Proposes an AB-FFS L2 model that features on a Governed Gas Pool, Bridge Insurance Fund, and moderate operational assumptions. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What does "AB-FFS" mean? (Google not helping)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It should be NB-FFS. NB = native bridge, FFS = MIP-34.
AB was abbreviation for atomic bridge, but we moved on from that name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Eventually all own abbreviations should go into the Movement glossary. but its wip
|
Why have the informer and the relayer be separate services? Unless they're just illustrated separately for clarity. |
The relayer should monitor that
This helps to check that
making them the same service seems to remove partially the point of an informer |
Summary