Skip to content

[review] MIP-54: The Biarritz Model#54

Open
l-monninger wants to merge 12 commits into
mainfrom
l-monninger/the-biarritz-model
Open

[review] MIP-54: The Biarritz Model#54
l-monninger wants to merge 12 commits into
mainfrom
l-monninger/the-biarritz-model

Conversation

@l-monninger
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

@l-monninger l-monninger requested a review from apenzk as a code owner November 11, 2024 12:04
@apenzk apenzk changed the title [draft] MIP-54: The Biarritz Model [review] MIP-54: The Biarritz Model Nov 12, 2024
Comment thread MIP/mip-54/README.md Outdated
Comment thread MIP/mip-54/README.md Outdated
Comment thread MIP/mip-54/README.md Outdated
Comment thread MIP/mip-54/README.md Outdated
Comment thread MIP/mip-54/README.md
Comment thread MIP/mip-54/README.md Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
# MIP-54: The Biarritz Model
- **Description**: Proposes an AB-FFS L2 model that features on a Governed Gas Pool, Bridge Insurance Fund, and moderate operational assumptions.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What does "AB-FFS" mean? (Google not helping)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should be NB-FFS. NB = native bridge, FFS = MIP-34.

AB was abbreviation for atomic bridge, but we moved on from that name.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Eventually all own abbreviations should go into the Movement glossary. but its wip

https://movementlabsxyz.github.io/MIP/GLOSSARY.html

@elliottdehn
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Why have the informer and the relayer be separate services? Unless they're just illustrated separately for clarity.
It's not clear to me that each would need to be separate from a resource profile perspective; more services means more complexity.

@apenzk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

apenzk commented Feb 12, 2025

@elliottdehn

Why have the informer and the relayer be separate services? Unless they're just illustrated separately for clarity. It's not clear to me that each would need to be separate from a resource profile perspective; more services means more complexity.

The relayer should monitor that

  • circulating supply makes sense

This helps to check that

  • relayer works correct
  • relayer is still active

making them the same service seems to remove partially the point of an informer

@apenzk apenzk self-requested a review February 12, 2025 16:16
@apenzk apenzk requested a review from franck44 March 10, 2025 14:15
apenzk
apenzk previously approved these changes Mar 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Biarritz model Needs changes Requires attention & changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants