[MEX-966] Missing fields from smart swap pairs

[claudiulataretu]

Reasoning

• smart swaps routes now require full token metadata

Proposed Changes

• use full token metadata for active pairs mapping

How to test

• swap query returning a smart swap field should not throw undefined error

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 88.88889% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 53.84%. Comparing base (1335498) to head (d2de3e3).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on development.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/helpers/api.config.service.ts	80.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           development    #1748    +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage        53.84%   53.84%            
=============================================
  Files              300      300            
  Lines            14749    14757     +8     
  Branches          1980     1981     +1     
=============================================
+ Hits              7941     7946     +5     
- Misses            6485     6805   +320     
+ Partials           323        6   -317     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	53.84% <88.88%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.