Skip to content

Conversation

@mqt-app
Copy link

@mqt-app mqt-app bot commented Jan 19, 2026

This pull request updates the files in this repository with the latest changes from the MQT Templates repository.
For details on the respective changes, see the changelog as well as the upgrade guide.

Note

This pull request may contain merge conflicts if there have been changes to a templated file and its template.
Resolve such conflicts manually before merging the pull request.

@mqt-app mqt-app bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 19, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to In Progress in MQT Jan 19, 2026
@mqt-app mqt-app bot force-pushed the update-mqt-templates branch from 6d5b267 to 3419c00 Compare January 19, 2026 17:48
@denialhaag
Copy link
Member

@burgholzer, I'm not sure whether we want or need .github/SUPPORT.md and docs/support.md. 🤔

Unfortunately, the synchronization of docs/support.md can currently be toggled via synchronize-documentation-utilities, which I would like to have activated. The synchronization of .github/SUPPORT.md, on the other hand, can be toggled via synchronize-support-resources. We set up the action like this so that projects that do not have a documentation page can still get .github/SUPPORT.md.

@denialhaag denialhaag self-assigned this Jan 19, 2026
Copy link
Member

@burgholzer burgholzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I don't see a reason for not including the support files. So this should be good to go.

@denialhaag
Copy link
Member

denialhaag commented Jan 19, 2026

LGTM. I don't see a reason for not including the support files. So this should be good to go.

Should we also link to it somewhere in the docs? We could maybe add a developer section in the sidebar, similar to the other projects. 🤔

@burgholzer
Copy link
Member

Yeah. I guess such a section would make sense. It's content would typically need to be a bit broader than in the other projects, but generally, I think it would be a good idea.

@denialhaag
Copy link
Member

Yeah. I guess such a section would make sense. It's content would typically need to be a bit broader than in the other projects, but generally, I think it would be a good idea.

I have now added a simple link in the sidebar and also used the chance to update the flyer. 😌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants