feat(proto): Mark PathEvent as #[non_exhaustive]

[matheus23]

Description

This is for future-proofing the API.

Closes #642

Breaking Changes

• enum PathEvent and all of its cases are now marked as #[non_exhaustive]

Notes & open questions

I'm ignoring the _ => case, as anything else would mean we would "do something" in case e.g. noq is bound against a newer noq-proto.
In #[cfg(test)] however, I panic, as in that case the version we depend on must be up to date.

Change checklist

• Self-review.

[github-actions]

Documentation for this PR has been generated and is available at: https://n0-computer.github.io/noq/pr/648/docs/noq/

Last updated: 2026-05-21T14:30:48Z

[github-actions]

Performance Comparison Report

f82023fb1cda3d4fe1df9f581861420ec9be6a91 - artifacts

Raw Benchmarks (localhost)

Scenario	noq	upstream	Delta	CPU (avg/max)
large-single	5659.8 Mbps	7948.1 Mbps	-28.8%	97.5% / 148.0%
medium-concurrent	5395.0 Mbps	8028.9 Mbps	-32.8%	95.9% / 147.0%
medium-single	4384.6 Mbps	4580.7 Mbps	-4.3%	92.0% / 101.0%
small-concurrent	3809.5 Mbps	5261.4 Mbps	-27.6%	94.3% / 101.0%
small-single	3588.7 Mbps	4801.6 Mbps	-25.3%	98.0% / 151.0%

Netsim Benchmarks (network simulation)

Condition	noq	upstream	Delta
ideal	3063.9 Mbps	N/A	N/A
lan	782.4 Mbps	N/A	N/A
lossy	69.8 Mbps	N/A	N/A
wan	83.8 Mbps	N/A	N/A

Summary

noq is 25.4% slower on average

---

fc551f37b2748b5fc85dcb1edc82e6f6cd797789 - artifacts

Raw Benchmarks (localhost)

Scenario	noq	upstream	Delta	CPU (avg/max)
large-single	5441.1 Mbps	7897.7 Mbps	-31.1%	94.3% / 100.0%
medium-concurrent	5413.6 Mbps	7518.9 Mbps	-28.0%	93.5% / 100.0%
medium-single	3816.1 Mbps	4700.2 Mbps	-18.8%	94.5% / 102.0%
small-concurrent	3830.6 Mbps	5231.1 Mbps	-26.8%	98.7% / 154.0%
small-single	3428.8 Mbps	4738.5 Mbps	-27.6%	90.4% / 98.4%

Summary

noq is 27.1% slower on average

---

8d720019675f1cfff950e2f28ed02d60b806efcc - artifacts

Raw Benchmarks (localhost)

Scenario	noq	upstream	Delta	CPU (avg/max)
large-single	5762.1 Mbps	7953.0 Mbps	-27.5%	94.5% / 101.0%
medium-concurrent	5600.4 Mbps	7676.2 Mbps	-27.0%	93.3% / 99.0%
medium-single	4032.3 Mbps	4589.5 Mbps	-12.1%	94.7% / 101.0%
small-concurrent	3925.7 Mbps	5193.5 Mbps	-24.4%	99.3% / 153.0%
small-single	3553.4 Mbps	4745.7 Mbps	-25.1%	89.6% / 97.4%

Netsim Benchmarks (network simulation)

Condition	noq	upstream	Delta
ideal	3072.4 Mbps	3980.5 Mbps	-22.8%
lan	782.4 Mbps	796.4 Mbps	-1.8%
lossy	69.8 Mbps	55.9 Mbps	+25.0%
wan	83.8 Mbps	83.8 Mbps	~0%

Summary

noq is 23.4% slower on average

---

794f0f33663a5e56d51c12e2dd988eb0d10e6e5b - artifacts

No results available

---

09b22ded8600edcf7aab5bef7b23ab60c5f3bb78 - artifacts

Raw Benchmarks (localhost)

Scenario	noq	upstream	Delta	CPU (avg/max)
large-single	5387.0 Mbps	7863.7 Mbps	-31.5%	92.9% / 99.0%
medium-concurrent	5417.3 Mbps	7613.9 Mbps	-28.8%	93.8% / 99.0%
medium-single	4153.1 Mbps	4749.5 Mbps	-12.6%	94.6% / 101.0%
small-concurrent	3713.5 Mbps	5370.3 Mbps	-30.8%	98.1% / 152.0%
small-single	3502.0 Mbps	4717.8 Mbps	-25.8%	89.5% / 97.5%

Netsim Benchmarks (network simulation)

Condition	noq	upstream	Delta
ideal	3092.0 Mbps	4093.0 Mbps	-24.5%
lan	782.4 Mbps	810.3 Mbps	-3.4%
lossy	69.8 Mbps	55.9 Mbps	+25.0%
wan	83.8 Mbps	83.8 Mbps	~0%

Summary

noq is 25.9% slower on average