Skip to content

Conversation

@pmundkur
Copy link

@pmundkur pmundkur commented Oct 1, 2025

Simplify the write_DM_reg interface; there is no reason for it to return a value.

Read-only registers don't need legalizers; simplify them to initializers.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Test Results

2 101 tests  ±0   2 101 ✅ ±0   16m 52s ⏱️ +13s
    1 suites ±0       0 💤 ±0 
    1 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 98d5ea1. ± Comparison against base commit c46a66c.

@nadime15 nadime15 merged commit 69f588d into nadime15:debug_all Oct 1, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
nadime15 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2025
* Simplify the `write_DM_reg` interface; there is no reason for it to return a value.

* Read-only registers don't need legalizers; simplify them to initializers.

* For now, treat hawindowsel as a read-only zero register.
nadime15 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
* Simplify the `write_DM_reg` interface; there is no reason for it to return a value.

* Read-only registers don't need legalizers; simplify them to initializers.

* For now, treat hawindowsel as a read-only zero register.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants