-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 180
Various fixes for generics #3163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Various fixes for generics #3163
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
1c9d4f7
to
ae1407f
Compare
ae1407f
to
41b4dba
Compare
- Fix handling of generic types and instances in several locations. - Fix access to MethodSpec_Index. - Add missing handling of MethodSpec in ldtoken instruction. - Fix field iteration in NewGenericInstanceObject.
Automated fixes for code style.
41b4dba
to
4cd1094
Compare
Description
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots
Types of changes
Checklist