Export account resource metrics and configuration

[MattiasAng]

Adds four new metrics that collects configured reserved memory and storage along with how many bytes are currently used of each.
This will allow users to monitor resource consumption based on set maximum.

I've decided to name the configured reserved metrics as max to align with configuration file rather than what the API response attribute is named (reserved).

Example response:

# HELP jetstream_account_max_memory JetStream Account Max Memory in bytes
# TYPE jetstream_account_max_memory gauge
jetstream_account_max_memory{account="test",account_id="test",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="test"} 1.048576e+07
# HELP jetstream_account_max_storage JetStream Account Max Storage in bytes
# TYPE jetstream_account_max_storage gauge
jetstream_account_max_storage{account="test",account_id="test",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="test"} 1.048576e+06
# HELP jetstream_account_memory_used Total number of bytes used by JetStream memory
# TYPE jetstream_account_memory_used gauge
jetstream_account_memory_used{account="test",account_id="test",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="test"} 0
# HELP jetstream_account_storage_used Total number of bytes used by JetStream storage
# TYPE jetstream_account_storage_used gauge
jetstream_account_storage_used{account="test",account_id="test",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="test"} 448245

[mtmk]

works as expected in my local R1 setup:

jetstream_account_max_memory{account="A",account_id="A",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="n1"} 5.12e+08
jetstream_account_max_memory{account="AC4",account_id="AC4",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="n1"} 1.8446744073709552e+19
jetstream_account_max_memory{account="B",account_id="B",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="n1"} 1.8446744073709552e+19
jetstream_account_max_storage{account="A",account_id="A",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="n1"} 1e+09
jetstream_account_max_storage{account="AC4",account_id="AC4",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="n1"} 1.8446744073709552e+19
jetstream_account_max_storage{account="B",account_id="B",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="n1"} 1.8446744073709552e+19
jetstream_account_memory_used{account="A",account_id="A",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="n1"} 0
jetstream_account_memory_used{account="AC4",account_id="AC4",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="n1"} 0
jetstream_account_memory_used{account="B",account_id="B",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="n1"} 0
jetstream_account_storage_used{account="A",account_id="A",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="n1"} 237
jetstream_account_storage_used{account="AC4",account_id="AC4",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="n1"} 0
jetstream_account_storage_used{account="B",account_id="B",cluster="",domain="",is_meta_leader="true",meta_leader="",server_id="http://localhost:8222",server_name="n1"} 0

[mtmk]

we don't seem to have any tests around the account metrics. not sure @MattiasAng are you feeling generous enough to write a test case or perhaps we can leave that to another PR. wdyt @piotrpio?

[dg-plejd]

Hi! I was actually about to submit a PR for these metrics but then found this PR. :)

I adjusted my code so now my PR only includes an updated test matching the metrics names of this PR.

The test is in this PR #351 should work.

Sorry if this is not the correct way of doing this

[mtmk]

Hi! I was actually about to submit a PR for these metrics but then found this PR. :)

I adjusted my code so now my PR only includes an updated test matching the metrics names of this PR.

The test is in this PR #351 should work.

Sorry if this is not the correct way of doing this

great! thanks @dg-plejd. more tests are always welcome. I'll have a look at the PR.

[MattiasAng]

Thanks @dg-plejd, I was about to say that I'm a bit short on time.

[plejd-sebman]

This one blocks #351 (adding test cases) so we would really appreciate that someone can review and move it on.

[mtmk]

LGTM

[mtmk]

This one blocks #351 (adding test cases) so we would really appreciate that someone can review and move it on.

thanks for the reminder @plejd-sebman and apologies for the delay. Please feel free to update #351 after merge cc @dg-plejd