Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bytt til tidslinjebibliotek fra familie-felles #5089

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

MagnusTonnessen
Copy link
Contributor

💰 Hva skal gjøres, og hvorfor?

Favro: NAV-23270

Fortsettelse av #5086
Bytter ut tidslinje fra ba-sak med tidslinje fra familie-felles enkelte steder.
Holder PR'ene små, så de skal være lette å lese.
Bør leses commit for commit.
Det er noe duplikatkode, men dette vil fjernes i senere PR'er

@MagnusTonnessen MagnusTonnessen requested a review from a team as a code owner February 19, 2025 11:17
@MagnusTonnessen MagnusTonnessen changed the title Tidslinje bibliotek Bytt til tidslinjebibliotek fra familie-felles Feb 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@idaame idaame left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MagnusTonnessen MagnusTonnessen added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 20, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit e0a6b60 Feb 20, 2025
8 checks passed
@MagnusTonnessen MagnusTonnessen deleted the tidslinje-bibliotek branch February 20, 2025 10:00
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2025
### 💰 Hva skal gjøres, og hvorfor?

Favro: NAV-23270

Fortsettelse av #5089 
Bytter ut tidslinje fra ba-sak med tidslinje fra familie-felles enkelte
steder.
Holder PR'ene små, så de skal være lette å lese.
Bør leses commit for commit.
Det er noe duplikatkode, men dette vil fjernes i senere PR'er
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants