feat: Implement Ulid type description in ClassDescriber #2556
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
thePanz
changed the title
thePanz
force-pushed
the
patch-1
branch
3 times, most recently
from
d24c6d9 to
98287b5
Compare
Add support for Ulid type in ClassDescriber. As the schema format is not bounded to any list, we use `ulid` for Ulid types here.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add support for Ulid type in ClassDescriber.
As the schema format is not bounded to any list, we use
ulidfor Ulid types here.Description
This allows Ulid properties to be properly labbelled as
type: string, format: ulidin the schema definition.In turns, this allows data to be passed using one of the (short) forms of ULIDs too
What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
Checklist
docs/)CHANGELOG.md)