fix: Handle missing blocks to prevent sync stall

[eval-exec]

This PR want to fix a bug:
When the filter protocol matches blocks, they're added to matched_blocks and we request their proofs/data. The batch waits until all blocks are downloaded before processing. However, some matched blocks may be uncle blocks (orphaned from old forks) or blocks peers don't have. When peers respond with missing_block_hashes, these blocks remain in matched_blocks, causing the batch to stall indefinitely waiting for blocks that will never arrive.

Changes:

1. When blocks are marked as missing in send_blocks_proof.rs, remove them from matched_blocks
2. Add periodic cleanup (1 hour) for old missing headers in fetching_headers
3. Skip blocks marked as missing when recovering matched blocks from storage

[eval-exec]

Request for @Officeyutong @driftluo @zhangsoledad @quake @chenyukang @gpBlockchain 's review.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.71429% with 41 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 72.01%. Comparing base (c9d489d) to head (a8c2c94).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ht-client-lib/src/protocols/filter/block_filter.rs	55.55%	12 Missing ⚠️
...ocols/light_client/components/send_blocks_proof.rs	65.38%	9 Missing ⚠️
light-client-lib/src/protocols/synchronizer.rs	52.94%	8 Missing ⚠️
...ght-client-lib/src/protocols/light_client/peers.rs	80.64%	6 Missing ⚠️
light-client-lib/src/storage/db/native.rs	72.22%	5 Missing ⚠️
light-client-lib/src/protocols/light_client/mod.rs	91.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #257      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    72.04%   72.01%   -0.04%     
===========================================
  Files           28       28              
  Lines         6937     7042     +105     
===========================================
+ Hits          4998     5071      +73     
- Misses        1939     1971      +32     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	72.01% <70.71%> (-0.04%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.