Skip to content

Add missing HPE OfficeConnect 1920 Series Switches #2984

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bastianleicht
Copy link
Contributor

@bastianleicht bastianleicht commented Apr 10, 2025

https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=c04478097&docLocale=en_US

Adds the missing:

  • HPE OfficeConnect 1920-48G-PoE-370W
  • HPE OfficeConnect 1920-24G-PoE-370W
  • HPE OfficeConnect 1920-24G-PoE-180W
  • HPE OfficeConnect 1920-8G-PoE-180W
  • HPE OfficeConnect 1920-8G-PoE-65W
  • HPE OfficeConnect 1920-48G

@Copilot Copilot bot review requested due to automatic review settings April 10, 2025 07:07
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

device-types/HPE/OfficeConnect-1920-48G.yml:1

  • This file does not include 'front_image' and 'rear_image' keys, which are present in other device definitions. Consider adding these fields for consistent UI display if applicable.
---

device-types/HPE/OfficeConnect-1920-48G-PoE-370W.yml:1

  • Unlike other PoE device definitions, this file is missing 'front_image' and 'rear_image' keys. Consider adding these fields to maintain consistency across device definitions.
---

@bastianleicht bastianleicht requested a review from Copilot April 10, 2025 07:15
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

device-types/HPE/OfficeConnect-1920-48G.yml:17

  • [nitpick] Consider using a consistent naming convention for interfaces across device definitions. For example, use the 'GE1/0/1' format (as in the 8G models) instead of numeric strings.
  - name: '1'

device-types/HPE/OfficeConnect-1920-48G-PoE-370W.yml:16

  • [nitpick] Consider using a consistent naming convention for interfaces across device definitions. For example, adopt the 'GE1/0/1' format (similar to other models) instead of numeric strings.
  - name: '1'

device-types/HPE/OfficeConnect-1920-48G.yml:2

  • [nitpick] For consistency with other device definitions, consider adding 'front_image' and 'rear_image' keys even if their values are false.
manufacturer: HPE

@harryajc harryajc added the status: revisions needed This issue requires additional information to be actionable label Apr 11, 2025
@bastianleicht bastianleicht requested a review from harryajc April 15, 2025 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: revisions needed This issue requires additional information to be actionable
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants