Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes: #15924 - Prevent API payload from allowing tagged_vlans while interface mode is set to tagged-all #17211

Draft
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: feature
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DanSheps
Copy link
Member

@DanSheps DanSheps commented Aug 20, 2024

Fixes: #15924 and #17249 - Prevent API payload from allowing tagged_vlans while interface mode is set to taged-all and prevent API from allowing untagged_vlan when no 802.1q mode is set.

  • Prevent API (or any API write function) which includes untagged_vlan with interface 802.1q mode is not set
  • Prevent API (or any API write function) which includes tagged_vlans with interface mode set to tagged-all

@DanSheps DanSheps self-assigned this Aug 20, 2024
@DanSheps DanSheps added the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label Aug 20, 2024
@DanSheps DanSheps requested review from jeremystretch and removed request for jeremystretch August 21, 2024 20:17
@jeremystretch jeremystretch removed the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label Aug 23, 2024
netbox/dcim/api/serializers_/device_components.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
netbox/dcim/models/device_components.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
…er model in addition to not being able to check incoming vlans under same model.
@DanSheps DanSheps changed the title Fixes: #15924 - Prevent API payload from allowing tagged_vlans while interface mode is set to taged-all Fixes: #15924 - Prevent API payload from allowing tagged_vlans while interface mode is set to tagged-all Aug 30, 2024
@DanSheps DanSheps changed the base branch from develop to feature August 30, 2024 02:34
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed automatically if no further action is taken.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pending closure Requires immediate attention to avoid being closed for inactivity label Sep 15, 2024
@DanSheps DanSheps removed the pending closure Requires immediate attention to avoid being closed for inactivity label Sep 16, 2024
@DanSheps
Copy link
Member Author

Per maintainer meeting, need to refactor logic to try and streamline the checks.

@DanSheps DanSheps marked this pull request as draft September 24, 2024 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants