Skip to content

Fix references resolved by xml2rfc#185

Open
avtobiff wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
avtobiff/fix-yang-module-versioning-references
Open

Fix references resolved by xml2rfc#185
avtobiff wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
avtobiff/fix-yang-module-versioning-references

Conversation

@avtobiff
Copy link
Collaborator

The xml2rfc tool could not resolve the references in the yang-module-versioning draft.

Also removes rfc-6991-bis reference, unused import, see #172.

The xml2rfc tool could not resolve the references in the
yang-module-versioning draft.

Also removes rfc-6991-bis reference, unused import, see #172.
Copy link
Collaborator

@jsterne jsterne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine to me

<?rfc include='reference.RFC.8525'?>
<?ref include='reference.I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-semver'?>
<?ref include='reference.I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis'?>
<?rfc include='reference.RFC.2119.xml'?>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure why we need to add .xml to the references, this looks unusual to me. But I agree with removing the stale reference to rfc6991-bis

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, we import ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis in the YANG module, so I think that the fix is to go the other way and explicitly state and reference that module.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please can you still check that it works with:

https://author-tools.ietf.org/

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

xml2rfc --legacy works fine. Should I migrate the document to xml2rfc v3 instead?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it'd be great if you could do that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants