Repository navigation
Update to latest BoringSSL commit sha - #939
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Motivation: Motivation: It's been a while since we updated our used BoringSSL version. Modifications: Update to sha of current BoringSSL commit Result: Use latest BoringSSL version as of today
dongjoon-hyun
added a commit
to apache/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2025
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to upgrade `netty-tcnative` to 2.0.74.Final. ### Why are the changes needed? To bring the latest bug fixes. - netty/netty-tcnative@netty-tcnative-parent-2.0.73.Final...netty-tcnative-parent-2.0.74.Final - netty/netty-tcnative#940 - netty/netty-tcnative#939 - google/boringssl@cccf852...0226f30 (499 changed files with 42,423 additions and 13,220 deletions) ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No behavior change. ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #52547 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-53843. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
huangxiaopingRD
pushed a commit
to huangxiaopingRD/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to upgrade `netty-tcnative` to 2.0.74.Final. ### Why are the changes needed? To bring the latest bug fixes. - netty/netty-tcnative@netty-tcnative-parent-2.0.73.Final...netty-tcnative-parent-2.0.74.Final - netty/netty-tcnative#940 - netty/netty-tcnative#939 - google/boringssl@cccf852...0226f30 (499 changed files with 42,423 additions and 13,220 deletions) ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No behavior change. ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#52547 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-53843. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation:
Motivation:
It's been a while since we updated our used BoringSSL version.
Modifications:
Update to sha of current BoringSSL commit
Result:
Use latest BoringSSL version as of today