Release v2.10.2 nr1

[Kesav531]

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

• squashed commits
• includes documentation
• adds unit tests
• adds or updates e2e tests

To fix the problem, explicitly define a minimal permissions block so the GITHUB_TOKEN is limited to read-only access to repository contents (and any other scopes strictly required). For this specific job, it only checks out the code and runs a shell script using environment variables; no write operations to GitHub are visible. The minimal necessary permission is therefore contents: read, which is sufficient for actions/checkout to work.

The best way to fix this without changing existing functionality is to add a permissions block at the job level, directly under verify: and before runs-on: in .github/workflows/pr-verify.yml. This will scope the restriction to this job only, and clearly documents the required permissions. Concretely, in .github/workflows/pr-verify.yml, around line 8–10, insert:

    permissions:
      contents: read

so that the verify job explicitly states that it only needs read access to repository contents. No additional imports, methods, or definitions are needed, since this is just a YAML configuration change.

General fix approach: Avoid converting from an architecture‑dependent int to a smaller integer type without enforcing that the value fits in the target type. For parsed numeric strings, either parse directly into the desired bit size via strconv.ParseInt/ParseUint, or add explicit upper/lower bound checks before casting.

Best fix for this code: In buildAPIEndpoint, replace strconv.Atoi with strconv.ParseInt specifying 32 bits and return int32(parsed) directly. This avoids the problematic int intermediate entirely and guarantees that any value that doesn’t fit in 32 bits causes a parse error, which the function already handles by returning the error. No change in observable behavior occurs for valid port numbers (0–65535), and the code becomes robust and architecture‑independent.

Concretely, in controlplane/rosa/controllers/rosacontrolplane_controller.go around lines 1392–1399:

• Change port, err := strconv.Atoi(portStr) to port64, err := strconv.ParseInt(portStr, 10, 32).
• Adjust the error handling variable name accordingly.
• Change the returned struct field from Port: int32(port) to Port: int32(port64).

No new imports are needed; strconv is already imported.

---