Skip to content

[DO NOT MERGE]docs: restructure AlloyDB integration with WIF metrics and all 4 resource types#24377

Draft
sparsi17 wants to merge 2 commits into
newrelic:developfrom
sparsi17:docs/gcp-alloydb
Draft

[DO NOT MERGE]docs: restructure AlloyDB integration with WIF metrics and all 4 resource types#24377
sparsi17 wants to merge 2 commits into
newrelic:developfrom
sparsi17:docs/gcp-alloydb

Conversation

@sparsi17

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Adds a Workload Identity Federation section with dimensional Metric event queries for all 4 AlloyDB resource types
  • Entities table: GCPALLOYDBCLUSTER / GCPALLOYDBINSTANCE / GCPALLOYDBDATABASE / GCPALLOYDBINSTANCENODE
  • Key metrics — Cluster: 2 gcp.alloydb.cluster.* metrics
  • Key metrics — Instance: 13 gcp.alloydb.instance.* metrics
  • Key metrics — Database: 20 gcp.alloydb.database.postgresql.* metrics (aggregate / perquery / pertag)
  • Key metrics — Instance Node: 13 gcp.alloydb.node.* metrics
  • Dimensions table: project_id, cluster_id, instance_id, database, node_id, location, gcp.resource.type
  • Updates Activate integration section with WIF (recommended) and service account / user account links
  • Adds <Callout variant="tip"> coming-soon box for WIF/service-account auth paths
  • Service account section preserves all existing GcpAlloydbClusterSample, GcpAlloydbInstanceSample, and GcpAlloydbDatabaseSample sample-event tables (Unit column added for clarity)

Test plan

  • Verify MDX renders correctly in docs preview
  • Confirm all 4 entities appear in Entities table
  • Check all anchor links resolve (#wif, #service-account, #polling, #activate)
  • Confirm existing sample-event tables are intact

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@CLAassistant

CLAassistant commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @sparsi17 👋

Thanks for your pull request! Your PR is in a queue, and a writer will take a look soon. We generally publish small edits within one business day, and larger edits within three days.

Please ensure the propsed changes look good by building it first in your local environment. Refer to this contribution guide to get the site up and running in your local.

If you really require a preview url, reach out to one of the writers and they will generate one for you.

@adutta-newrelic adutta-newrelic marked this pull request as draft June 11, 2026 04:39
@adutta-newrelic adutta-newrelic changed the title docs: restructure AlloyDB integration with WIF metrics and all 4 resource types [DO NOT MERGE]docs: restructure AlloyDB integration with WIF metrics and all 4 resource types Jun 11, 2026
@adutta-newrelic adutta-newrelic self-requested a review June 11, 2026 04:40
@adutta-newrelic adutta-newrelic self-assigned this Jun 11, 2026
@adutta-newrelic adutta-newrelic added documentation from_internal Identifies issues/PRs from Relics (except writers) labels Jun 11, 2026
sparsi17 and others added 2 commits June 11, 2026 10:33
…urce types

- Add Workload Identity Federation section with dimensional Metric event
  queries for all 4 resources: cluster, instance, database, instance node
- Entities table: GCPALLOYDBCLUSTER, GCPALLOYDBINSTANCE, GCPALLOYDBDATABASE,
  GCPALLOYDBINSTANCENODE
- Key metrics — Cluster: 2 gcp.alloydb.cluster.* metrics
- Key metrics — Instance: 13 gcp.alloydb.instance.* metrics
- Key metrics — Database: 20 gcp.alloydb.database.postgresql.* metrics
- Key metrics — Instance Node: 13 gcp.alloydb.node.* metrics
- Dimensions table (project_id, cluster_id, instance_id, database, node_id,
  location, gcp.resource.type)
- Update Activate integration section with WIF + service account links
- Add coming-soon Callout for WIF/service-account auth paths
- Service account section preserves GcpAlloydbClusterSample,
  GcpAlloydbInstanceSample, GcpAlloydbDatabaseSample with Unit column added

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation from_internal Identifies issues/PRs from Relics (except writers)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants