Skip to content

Update ownership for uninstrumented entity definitions#2699

Open
bgalmesnr wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
add-ownership-for-uninstrumented-definitions
Open

Update ownership for uninstrumented entity definitions#2699
bgalmesnr wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
add-ownership-for-uninstrumented-definitions

Conversation

@bgalmesnr
Copy link
Contributor

Relevant information

Updates entity ownership for UNINSTRUMENTED definitions that had no owner assigned. It matches the owner on the regular entity types.

Checklist

  • I've read the guidelines and understand the acceptance criteria.
  • The value of the attribute marked as identifier will be unique and valid.
  • I've confirmed that my entity type wasn't already defined. If it is I'm providing an explanation above.

@entityBot entityBot requested review from a team March 16, 2026 10:02
teamName: "no owner"
teamName: "OnHost Agent and Integrations"
secondaryOwners:
- teamName: "K8s Agents"
Copy link
Contributor

@vlopeziglesias vlopeziglesias Mar 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think APM may also be interested, as they use CONTAINER candidate

@entityBot
Copy link
Collaborator

⚠️ Review Required ⚠️

👋 This PR has seen no activity in over 3 days and is still awaiting approval from: @newrelic/BEYOND, @newrelic/OHAI, @newrelic/K8S-AGENTS

Please review or provide an update.

Copy link
Contributor

@nr-ksteinbach nr-ksteinbach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants