feat: Add new K8s pod <> pvc <> pv relationships in Stg by codylawson · Pull Request #3003 · newrelic/entity-definitions

codylawson · 2026-07-01T16:48:30Z

Relevant information

Adding new relationships for

PVC <> PV (replace Cluster <> PV)
POD <> PVC (otel rule is missing due to missing metrics)

Business justification doc: https://newrelic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/KOT/pages/5297407012/Business+Justification+for+K8s+Entities+relationships

Api Review Board (ARB)
ARB Jira ticket:
https://new-relic.atlassian.net/browse/NR-541144

Checklist

I've read the guidelines and understand the acceptance criteria.
The value of the attribute marked as identifier will be unique and valid.
I've confirmed that my entity type wasn't already defined. If it is I'm providing an explanation above.

…nships

entityBot

beep boop bop.

I have found some errors processing these changes:

No valid, approved ARB ticket found in the PR description. This PR has to be reviewed by the API Review Board, please include a link to the ticket of that review in the PR description. Check how to start the process here or reach #api-review-board channel in case of doubts

Let's validate those changes.

entityBot

beep boop bop.

I have found some errors processing these changes:

No valid, approved ARB ticket found in the PR description. This PR has to be reviewed by the API Review Board, please include a link to the ticket of that review in the PR description. Check how to start the process here or reach #api-review-board channel in case of doubts

entityBot

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

entityBot

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

entityBot

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

vlopeziglesias · 2026-07-07T09:40:09Z

+          account:
+            lookup: true
+          domain:
+            value: INFRA
+          type:
+            value: KUBERNETES_PERSISTENTVOLUMECLAIM
+          identifier:
+            fragments:
+              - attribute: k8s.cluster.name
+              - value: ":"
+              - attribute: k8s.namespace.name
+              - value: ":"
+              - attribute: k8s.pvc.name
+            hashAlgorithm: FARM_HASH
+      target:
+        buildGuid:
+          account:
+            lookup: true


You cannot have lookup: true in both sides, one of the accounts has to be known

…-to-INFRA-KUBERNETES_PERSISTENTVOLUME.stg.yml Co-authored-by: Daniel Budziwojski <dbudziwojski@newrelic.com>

…ES_PERSISTENTVOLUMECLAIM.stg.yml Co-authored-by: Daniel Budziwojski <dbudziwojski@newrelic.com>

entityBot

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

entityBot

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

entityBot

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

…wson/entity-definitions into k8s-pod-pvc-relationships

entityBot

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

CLAassistant · 2026-07-08T15:08:17Z

All committers have signed the CLA.

maxa101 added 5 commits March 17, 2026 20:00

updating the POD, PV and PVC

d72ba42

Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into k8s-pod-pvc-relatio…

9caf481

…nships

fix tests

caad82b

Merge branch 'main' into k8s-pod-pvc-relationships

0786d50

Merge branch 'main' into k8s-pod-pvc-relationships

1c25571

entityBot added the ARB:pending label Jul 1, 2026

entityBot previously requested changes Jul 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

entityBot requested a review from a team July 1, 2026 16:48

Merge branch 'main' into k8s-pod-pvc-relationships

3fb79d1

entityBot requested changes Jul 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

naxhh requested a review from entityBot July 3, 2026 09:41

entityBot added ARB:not-required and removed ARB:pending labels Jul 3, 2026

entityBot approved these changes Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

mborroni added the EP:performance concern label Jul 6, 2026

Merge branch 'main' into k8s-pod-pvc-relationships

2f84d10

entityBot approved these changes Jul 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' into k8s-pod-pvc-relationships

51005f9

entityBot previously approved these changes Jul 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

vlopeziglesias reviewed Jul 7, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread relationships/synthesis/INFRA-KUBERNETES_POD-to-INFRA-KUBERNETES_PERSISTENTVOLUMECLAIM.stg.yml Outdated

dbudziwojskiNR reviewed Jul 7, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread ...ynthesis/INFRA-KUBERNETES_PERSISTENTVOLUMECLAIM-to-INFRA-KUBERNETES_PERSISTENTVOLUME.stg.yml Outdated

dbudziwojskiNR reviewed Jul 7, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread relationships/synthesis/INFRA-KUBERNETES_POD-to-INFRA-KUBERNETES_PERSISTENTVOLUMECLAIM.stg.yml Outdated

Update relationships/synthesis/INFRA-KUBERNETES_PERSISTENTVOLUMECLAIM…

2df02f3

…-to-INFRA-KUBERNETES_PERSISTENTVOLUME.stg.yml Co-authored-by: Daniel Budziwojski <dbudziwojski@newrelic.com>

codylawson dismissed entityBot’s stale review via 2df02f3 July 8, 2026 14:44

Update relationships/synthesis/INFRA-KUBERNETES_POD-to-INFRA-KUBERNET…

1c59aa2

…ES_PERSISTENTVOLUMECLAIM.stg.yml Co-authored-by: Daniel Budziwojski <dbudziwojski@newrelic.com>

entityBot approved these changes Jul 8, 2026

View reviewed changes

entityBot requested a review from a team July 8, 2026 14:44

entityBot approved these changes Jul 8, 2026

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' into k8s-pod-pvc-relationships

2a8a55b

entityBot previously approved these changes Jul 8, 2026

View reviewed changes

vlopeziglesias reviewed Jul 8, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread ...ynthesis/INFRA-KUBERNETES_PERSISTENTVOLUMECLAIM-to-INFRA-KUBERNETES_PERSISTENTVOLUME.stg.yml

nr-codylawson added 2 commits July 8, 2026 09:07

fix: Add entityType to otel pvc to pv

4a143d8

Merge branch 'k8s-pod-pvc-relationships' of https://github.com/codyla…

f08bc91

…wson/entity-definitions into k8s-pod-pvc-relationships

codylawson dismissed entityBot’s stale review via f08bc91 July 8, 2026 15:08

entityBot approved these changes Jul 8, 2026

View reviewed changes

vlopeziglesias approved these changes Jul 8, 2026

View reviewed changes

vlopeziglesias merged commit 6b8abe9 into newrelic:main Jul 8, 2026
4 checks passed

Uh oh!

Conversation

codylawson commented Jul 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Relevant information

Checklist

Uh oh!

entityBot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

entityBot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

entityBot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

entityBot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

entityBot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

vlopeziglesias Jul 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

entityBot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

entityBot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

entityBot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

entityBot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

CLAassistant commented Jul 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants

codylawson commented Jul 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vlopeziglesias Jul 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

CLAassistant commented Jul 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading