Feat: dynamic canaries#2686
Open
alvarocabanas wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
alvarocabanas
commented
Jul 10, 2026
alvarocabanas
commented
Contributor
- Changes fleet_deployment.sh to use the Fleet API in newrelic-cli instead of using Graphql directly.
- Adds a scheduled GitHub Action (every 6h) that rotates the canary fleets through an ordered set of agent config versions, advancing one step per run and wrapping around. Each run fans out over a matrix of environment (staging/production) and platform (linux/windows), deploying via the newrelic-CLI-based fleet_deployment.sh.
alvarocabanas
force-pushed
the
feat/dynamic_canaries
branch
from
c423970 to
ac98283
Compare
…ur canaries and refactors fleet_deployment.sh to use the fleet API in newrelic-cli
alvarocabanas
force-pushed
the
feat/dynamic_canaries
branch
from
ac98283 to
7bcc953
Compare
| # Second -> NRDOT 1.19.0 (canaries-nrdot) | ||
| AGENT_SPECS_LINUX_STAGING: >- | ||
| NRInfra:1.77.1:MTIyMTMwNjh8TkdFUHxBR0VOVF9DT05GSUdVUkFUSU9OX1ZFUlNJT058MDE5ZjViZTItYjdkYy03YmM5LTg0OTUtYTIyMmI5NTYyZDAy | ||
| NRDOT:1.19.0:MTIyMTMwNjh8TkdFUHxBR0VOVF9DT05GSUdVUkFUSU9OX1ZFUlNJT058MDE5ZjViZTMtNmU3YS03NzA0LWI0NjgtOTAwMDY1NjgyMWJj |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It should be MTIyMTMwNjh8TkdFUHxBR0VOVF9DT05GSUdVUkFUSU9OX1ZFUlNJT058MDE5ZjViZTQtMWFmNC03YmM4LTlmZDgtZmQ3YzIzMWNlNzMx I think.
The one here points to canaries-infra-config-windows. It's a copy paste from the one below.
sigilioso
reviewed
Jul 13, 2026
Comment on lines
+39
to
+43
| AGENT_SPECS_LINUX_PRODUCTION: >- | ||
| NRInfra:1.77.1:NjQyNTg2NXxOR0VQfEFHRU5UX0NPTkZJR1VSQVRJT05fVkVSU0lPTnwwMTlmNGM3Yi1lYjAyLTc1MmQtOGViOC0zNDYyMWM2ZDRkMzQ | ||
| NRDOT:1.19.0:NjQyNTg2NXxOR0VQfEFHRU5UX0NPTkZJR1VSQVRJT05fVkVSU0lPTnwwMTlmNGM3Yy05M2Y3LTcyMjctODJmZS01OGYwMjcyMDViMDI | ||
| # First -> NRInfra 1.77.1 (canaries-infra-config-windows) | ||
| # Second -> NRDOT 1.19.0 (canaries-nrdot-windows) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are any of the existing alerts affected by switching between the infrastructure agent and nr-dot?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, good point, I didn't control it, and they will for sure fail, we are working on the samples, so the only way to make this work is making the alerts be compatible with both infra-agent and NRDOT.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.