Skip to content

chore(deps): update actions/setup-node action to v7 - #126

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/actions-setup-node-7.x
Open

chore(deps): update actions/setup-node action to v7#126
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/actions-setup-node-7.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
actions/setup-node action major v6v7

Release Notes

actions/setup-node (actions/setup-node)

v7.0.0

Compare Source

What's Changed
Enhancements:
Bug fixes:
Documentation updates:
Dependency update:
New Contributors

Full Changelog: actions/setup-node@v6...v7.0.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot assigned njzjz Aug 16, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot requested a review from njzjz August 16, 2026 15:32
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.56%. Comparing base (1cc3acb) to head (350a9d6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #126   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.56%   95.56%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        1285     1285           
=======================================
  Hits         1228     1228           
  Misses         57       57           
Flag Coverage Δ
python 94.37% <ø> (ø)
web 99.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/actions-setup-node-7.x branch from 49f93f9 to 54f9750 Compare August 16, 2026 16:17

@njzjz-bot njzjz-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed the complete one-line workflow change. The repository CI completed successfully for this head, and I found no blocking compatibility or behavior issue with the actions/setup-node v6 → v7 update while continuing to request Node.js 22.

Agent: ChatGPT
Model: GPT-5.6 Sol
GitHub account: njzjz-bot
Reviewed head: 54f9750
Trigger: scheduled review-request monitoring

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/actions-setup-node-7.x branch from 54f9750 to 8c8076b Compare August 26, 2026 02:34

@njzjz-bot njzjz-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-reviewed after the head changed. The complete diff is still a single workflow update from actions/setup-node@v6 to @v7 while requesting Node.js 22. The v7 action supports this input and runs on node24; this repository does not opt into setup-node package-manager caching via packageManager/devEngines, so the v7 default caching behavior does not introduce an unexpected cache path here. All three GitHub Actions workflows for this exact head completed successfully, and pre-commit.ci is also successful. I found no high-confidence functional, compatibility, security, or test-coverage blocker.

Agent: ChatGPT
Model: GPT-5.6 Sol
GitHub account: njzjz-bot
Reviewed head: 8c8076b
Trigger: scheduled review-request monitoring

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/actions-setup-node-7.x branch from 8c8076b to c769429 Compare August 28, 2026 06:30

@njzjz-bot njzjz-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-reviewed after the head changed. The complete diff remains a single workflow update from actions/setup-node@v6 to @v7 while continuing to request Node.js 22. I checked the repository README, package/test configuration, full workflow, existing reviews/discussion, and exact-head CI. The web job exercises the updated action directly, and all three GitHub Actions workflows plus pre-commit.ci succeeded for this head. No high-confidence functional, compatibility, security, or test-coverage issue was found.

Agent: ChatGPT
Model: GPT-5.6 Sol
GitHub account: njzjz-bot
Reviewed head: c769429
Trigger: scheduled review-request monitoring

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/actions-setup-node-7.x branch from c769429 to 350a9d6 Compare September 1, 2026 00:55

@njzjz-bot njzjz-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

APPROVE

I re-reviewed the updated head. The complete diff is still the single actions/setup-node v6 to v7 change in the web-test workflow, with Node.js 22 and the existing workflow behavior otherwise unchanged. I found no functional, compatibility, security, installation, or test-coverage blocker.

All three relevant GitHub Actions workflows and pre-commit.ci are successful for this exact head.

Agent: ChatGPT
Model: GPT-5.6 Pro
GitHub account: njzjz-bot
Reviewed head: 350a9d6
Trigger: scheduled review-request monitoring

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants