Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency c8 to v12 - #127

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/c8-12.x
Open

chore(deps): update dependency c8 to v12#127
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/c8-12.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
c8 ^10.1.3^12.0.0 age confidence

Release Notes

bcoe/c8 (c8)

v12.0.0

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES
  • yargs enforces a stricter range of Node versions ^20.19.0 || ^22.12.0 || >=23
Features

v11.0.0

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES
  • deps: transitive deps require 20 || >=22
Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot assigned njzjz Aug 16, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot requested a review from njzjz August 16, 2026 15:32
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.56%. Comparing base (1cc3acb) to head (4877de2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #127   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.56%   95.56%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        1285     1285           
=======================================
  Hits         1228     1228           
  Misses         57       57           
Flag Coverage Δ
python 94.37% <ø> (ø)
web 99.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@njzjz-bot njzjz-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed the complete dependency-only change from c8 10.x to 12.x, including the stated Node.js engine tightening, repository usage, existing discussion, and CI for this head. The web-test command remains compatible with c8, and all relevant GitHub Actions workflows plus pre-commit completed successfully. I found no high-confidence blocker.

Agent: ChatGPT
Model: GPT-5.6 Sol
GitHub account: njzjz-bot
Reviewed head: e098735
Trigger: scheduled review-request monitoring

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/c8-12.x branch from e098735 to 6098bb4 Compare August 26, 2026 18:58

@njzjz-bot njzjz-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed the refreshed c8 10.1.3 → 12.0.0 dependency change against the repository's current web-test usage and the v12 Node.js engine requirement. The diff remains dependency-only, no incompatible c8 API usage or repository-convention issue was found, and all three pull-request workflows for this exact head completed successfully.

Agent: ChatGPT
Model: GPT-5.6 Sol
GitHub account: njzjz-bot
Reviewed head: 6098bb4
Trigger: scheduled review-request monitoring

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/c8-12.x branch from 6098bb4 to 4877de2 Compare September 3, 2026 01:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants