-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
Who should fill in the role of Vice Chair of the TSC for 2025? #1770
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
I get this error: Downgrading to v5.10.0 fixed it |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
cc @nodejs/tsc a few people are still missing… please vote, I would love to close this tomorrow |
|
I would like to close this vote, and for this effect, I'm revealing my key part: |
|
I would like to close this vote, and for this effect, I'm revealing my key part: |
|
I would like to close this vote, and for this effect, I'm revealing my key part: FYI the current tool does not seem to work well with an interactive authorization of gpg. I had to check out to another branch and did a gpg signing on a commit to cache in the authorization before I decrypt the key. |
|
I would like to close this vote, and for this effect, I'm revealing my key part: |
I created this nodejs/caritat#60 to address this. |
|
@aduh95 I'm trying to close the vote, but either I'm not doing it right, or it doesn't work. |
|
@mcollina EDIT: looks like there's been a change in GH API, some comments contain unexpected |
Election resultsSubject: Who should fill in the role of Vice Chair of the TSC for 2025? ResultsWinning candidate: Both (jasnell and ruyadorno, as co-vice-chairs) Table of results
Voting dataParticipants:
Private key to decrypt ballotsFootnotes
|
mcollina
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
|
Congrats to @ruyadorno and @jasnell! |
mhdawson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
| "targos": { | ||
| "Ruy (ruyadorno)": 1, | ||
| "Both (jasnell and ruyadorno, as co-vice-chairs)": 0, | ||
| "James (jasnell)": 1 | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Open to suggestions, the reasoning is that whatever "duel" the tool was running (i.e. "both" vs "Ruy" or "both" vs "James"), your vote was always against the "both" option (or rather, in favor of the other option, but for the tooling it looks the same).
|
I'm going to go ahead and merge this now. Feel free to adjust the summary as necessary |

The vote can be closed after seven days, or as soon as all voting members have sent a ballot.
Refs: #1763
Vote instructions:
To close the vote, at least 3 secret holder(s)1 must run the following command:
git node vote https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/pull/1770 --decrypt-key-part --post-comment/cc @nodejs/tsc
Current estimated participation: 100%
Footnotes
secret holders are folks who have access to the private key associated with a public key on hkps://keys.openpgp.org that references an email address listed on the TSC voting member list at the time of the opening of the vote. ↩