Skip to content

softdevice_handler: correct return type of sdh_state_evt_observer_notify#578

Merged
eivindj-nordic merged 1 commit into
nrfconnect:mainfrom
eivindj-nordic:state_observer_fix
Dec 12, 2025
Merged

softdevice_handler: correct return type of sdh_state_evt_observer_notify#578
eivindj-nordic merged 1 commit into
nrfconnect:mainfrom
eivindj-nordic:state_observer_fix

Conversation

@eivindj-nordic
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@eivindj-nordic eivindj-nordic commented Dec 12, 2025

Correct return type of sdh_state_evt_observer_notify extern in nrf_sdh_ble.c

Thanks to @nvlsianpu for reporting.

Correct return type of sdh_state_evt_observer_notify extern in
nrf_sdh_ble.c

Signed-off-by: Eivind Jølsgard <eivind.jolsgard@nordicsemi.no>
@eivindj-nordic eivindj-nordic requested a review from a team as a code owner December 12, 2025 13:27
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added. label Dec 12, 2025
@eivindj-nordic eivindj-nordic removed the changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added. label Dec 12, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You can find the documentation preview for this PR here.

@lemrey
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lemrey commented Dec 12, 2025

I think this changed after #388 and it's now int.

@eivindj-nordic
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think this changed after #388 and it's now int.

No, it is bool
https://github.com/nrfconnect/sdk-nrf-bm/blob/main/subsys/softdevice_handler/nrf_sdh.c#L60

@lemrey
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lemrey commented Dec 12, 2025

You are correct, I was confusing it with the state event handler.

@eivindj-nordic eivindj-nordic merged commit 0a7a6b5 into nrfconnect:main Dec 12, 2025
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants