Skip to content

Conversation

@michalek-no
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@michalek-no michalek-no requested a review from Vge0rge August 19, 2025 10:48
@michalek-no michalek-no requested review from a team as code owners August 19, 2025 10:49
@github-actions github-actions bot added manifest changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added. labels Aug 19, 2025
@NordicBuilder
Copy link
Contributor

NordicBuilder commented Aug 19, 2025

The following west manifest projects have changed revision in this Pull Request:

Name Old Revision New Revision Diff

All manifest checks OK

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the Manifest GitHub Action.

@NordicBuilder
Copy link
Contributor

NordicBuilder commented Aug 19, 2025

CI Information

To view the history of this post, clich the 'edited' button above
Build number: 13

Inputs:

Sources:

sdk-nrf: PR head: d1c1a00f138aefb16b0e99e7d2d79bf157f24868

more details

sdk-nrf:

PR head: d1c1a00f138aefb16b0e99e7d2d79bf157f24868
merge base: 781ccab9623e5530b3a8a1f4636c0d6ed76c8f54
target head (main): 6df965071eee81dbb74f24fe3abb53247f0e087d
Diff

Github labels

Enabled Name Description
ci-disabled Disable the ci execution
ci-all-test Run all of ci, no test spec filtering will be done
ci-force-downstream Force execution of downstream even if twister fails
ci-run-twister Force run twister
ci-run-zephyr-twister Force run zephyr twister
List of changed files detected by CI (2)
modules
│  ├── mcuboot
│  │  ├── boot
│  │  │  ├── zephyr
│  │  │  │  │ Kconfig
sysbuild
│  │ CMakeLists.txt

Outputs:

Toolchain

Version: c5be9c56c7
Build docker image: docker-dtr.nordicsemi.no/sw-production/ncs-build:c5be9c56c7_bba2ea5f2e

Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped; ⚠️ Quarantine

  • ◻️ Toolchain - Skipped: existing toolchain is used
  • ✅ Build twister - Skipped: Skipping Build & Test as it succeeded in a previous run: 12
  • ✅ Integration tests
    • ✅ test-sdk-audio - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ desktop52_verification - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-apps - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test_ble_nrf_config - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_mesh - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_samples - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-chip - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nfc - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_cloud - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_libmodem-nrf - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_serial_lte_modem - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_zephyr_lwm2m - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_samples - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_lwm2m - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ doc-internal - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_thingy91 - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_crypto - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-rpc - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-rs - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-fem - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-tfm - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-thread-main - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-sdk-find-my
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_lrcs_mosh - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_lrcs_positioning - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-sdk-wifi - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-low-level - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-sdk-pmic-samples - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-sdk-mcuboot - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-sdk-dfu - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-ps-main - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
    • ✅ test-secdom-samples-public - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI

@NordicBuilder
Copy link
Contributor

NordicBuilder commented Aug 20, 2025

Memory footprint analysis revealed the following potential issues

applications.hpf.gpio.icmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High RAM usage: 9090[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
applications.hpf.gpio.icmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High ROM usage: 5846[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
applications.hpf.gpio.icbmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High RAM usage: 12430[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
applications.hpf.gpio.icbmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High ROM usage: 9178[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
applications.hpf.gpio.icbmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High RAM usage: 12430[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
applications.hpf.gpio.icbmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High ROM usage: 9178[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
applications.hpf.gpio.icmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High RAM usage: 9090[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
applications.hpf.gpio.icmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High ROM usage: 5846[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
applications.hpf.gpio.icmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High RAM usage: 9090[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
applications.hpf.gpio.icmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High ROM usage: 5846[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
sample.matter.template.release[nrf5340dk/nrf5340/cpuapp]: ROM size increased by 1480[B] in comparison to the main[4a222b7] branch. - link (cc: @kkasperczyk-no @ArekBalysNordic @markaj-nordic)
applications.hpf.gpio.icmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High RAM usage: 9090[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
applications.hpf.gpio.icmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High ROM usage: 5846[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI (latest/sdk-nrf/PR-24051/12)

@michalek-no
Copy link
Contributor Author

rebase

@github-actions
Copy link

You can find the documentation preview for this PR here.

@michalek-no
Copy link
Contributor Author

hash update

@michalek-no
Copy link
Contributor Author

rebase

@michalek-no michalek-no requested a review from a team as a code owner August 21, 2025 11:10
@miha-nordic
Copy link

@michalek-no @shanthanordic What Jira ticket it is related to as it has backport label?

@michalek-no
Copy link
Contributor Author

@michalek-no @shanthanordic What Jira ticket it is related to as it has backport label?

NCSDK-34996

This feature corrupts stack.

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Michalek <[email protected]>
@michalek-no
Copy link
Contributor Author

rebase

Copy link
Contributor

@frkv frkv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@shanthanordic shanthanordic added this to the 3.1.1 milestone Aug 26, 2025
@anangl anangl merged commit bd89c94 into nrfconnect:main Aug 26, 2025
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport v3.1-branch bugfix Fixes a known bug changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.