boards: Add nrf54lm20b where nrf54lm20a is used#27748
Conversation
d0f9508 to
4a8d10c
Compare
CI InformationTo view the history of this post, click the 'edited' button above Inputs:Sources:sdk-nrf: PR head: a65f1e703461d4540ec1094afebff38d9cc3567f more detailssdk-nrf:
Github labels
List of changed files detected by CI (14)Outputs:ToolchainVersion: 911f4c5c26 Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped;
|
4a8d10c to
491ea57
Compare
|
You can find the documentation preview for this PR here. |
Memory footprint analysis revealed the following potential issuesapplications.hpf.gpio.icbmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High RAM usage: 12662[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus) Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI (latest/sdk-nrf/PR-27748/7) |
|
Already checked single FLPR LM20B and IPC tests, working fine now. |
nordicjm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As said in the discussion chat, flpr should not nor should it have been using PM since it's designated usage in NCS is for HPF which mandates PM is disabled
f640c33 to
0cfb3b5
Compare
nRF54LM20a and nRF54LM20b are functionally identical in most of the cases. Added nRF54LM20B support across build system and source files where nRF54LM20a is explicitly mentioned. Signed-off-by: Artur Hadasz <artur.hadasz@nordicsemi.no>
0cfb3b5 to
a65f1e7
Compare
|
Merging based on @shanthanordic approval |
nRF54LM20a and nRF54LM20b are functionally identical in most of the cases. Added nRF54LM20B support
across build system and source files where nRF54LM20a is explicitly mentioned.