Skip to content

Conversation

@stefaniebutland
Copy link

@stefaniebutland stefaniebutland commented Jul 28, 2025

Pull Request (PR) draft checklist - click to expand
  • Please review our
    contributing documentation
    before getting started.
  • Populate a descriptive title. For example, instead of "Updated README.md", use a
    title such as "Add testing details to the contributor section of the README".
    Example PRs: #763
  • Populate the body of the pull request with:
  • Update CHANGELOG.md with details about your change in a section titled
    ## Unreleased. If such a section does not exist, please create one. Follow
    Common Changelog for your additions.
    Example PRs: #763
  • Update the documentation and/or the README.md with details of changes to the
    earthaccess interface, if any. Consider new environment variables, function names,
    decorators, etc.

Click the "Ready for review" button at the bottom of the "Conversation" tab in GitHub
once these requirements are fulfilled. Don't worry if you see any test failures in
GitHub at this point!

Pull Request (PR) merge checklist - click to expand

Please do your best to complete these requirements! If you need help with any of these
requirements, you can ping the @nsidc/earthaccess-support team in a comment and we
will help you out!

  • Add unit tests for any new features.
  • Apply formatting and linting autofixes. You can add a GitHub comment in this Pull
    Request containing "pre-commit.ci autofix" to automate this.
  • Ensure all automated PR checks (seen at the bottom of the "conversation" tab) pass.
  • Get at least one approving review.

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://earthaccess--1056.org.readthedocs.build/en/1056/

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 115fc1f

I will automatically update this comment whenever this PR is modified

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 747216a

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit b31a1e2

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 5fbf409

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 2d4eef9

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 2b72842

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 9147465

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit eb18df8

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit eb586c8

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit f6b5aea

In 2025 Seattle, we won $5K for our idea! This is a short way to document what we did, and to credit non-traditional contributors and contributions.

## Brief timeline

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a visual timeline might be powerful to show just how short a time this took place in .... after the years of work and community that led to this

Wed July 23 at 10am, Julie types in NASA Openscapes Mentors doc:

What’s a small something/Earthaccess feature to pitch at ESIP :) Julie thinking of proposing: “piloting earthaccess with NOAA data”. Or other ideas?

Synchronous discussion ensued in Julie's absence and was quite technical focusing on datasets that could be used. Amy opened an earthaccess GitHub Discussion.

Thursday night poster-making. "lets's do a song". Powerful pivot to simplicity in the pitch song lyrics: we want to have NASA, NOAA, USGS, Copernicus data in our hands! (implicit: open science for all!).

Friday 15mins before Friday pitch time, Kate Wing, affiliation and singer, notices the stanzas of the song aren't quite right and she marks up the sheet and re-writes on bigger paper so all the "performers" can see.

Who is singing/ pitching? Boom!: 4 people, each from NASA, NOAA, Intertidal Agency, and Openscapes. Reflecting: this would absolutely not have happened without hours and years of prior connections, collaborations, trust- and community-building, and sync and async social interactions among these 4 and our collective web of humans. ("Want to build community? Go to other peoples' parties!" Analagous to: learn to understand and contribute to someone else's software before creating your own from scratch)

The Pitch (see what we did there?). Kate gives a "hummmmm" to start everyone on the right note then uses her finger like a bouncing lyric ball to guide the group. The fun song transitions to a crystal clear and emphatic ask from Julie: "We will use FUNDing Friday award to ....".

We win!

@jhkennedy
Copy link
Collaborator

I think we should also link the video here. @jules32, what do you think?

@jules32
Copy link
Contributor

jules32 commented Jul 28, 2025

Great minds! Yes I have more edits to make, it's still a draft PR :)

@jules32
Copy link
Contributor

jules32 commented Jul 29, 2025

OK I think it's all set as a PR; I put it in a folder but likely not the best place or name so please feel free to move/rename :)

Also linking to the discussion: #1054

@mfisher87
Copy link
Collaborator

I think this should live within the docs website. Nobody will see it if it's just in the repo! I think it's a good piece of evidence that this is a fun community to join. Maybe we should have a "this is a fun project"-type directory in the docs? Perhaps under "work with us"? Other ideas?

@jules32
Copy link
Contributor

jules32 commented Jul 30, 2025

I like that idea @mfisher87 , I agree it needs visibility by being part of the website, not the GitHub repo. Wherever you think best! Thank you!

@mfisher87
Copy link
Collaborator

Any ideas for how we might name this page / potential future group of pages? "This is a fun project" under "work with us" may be fine, but I'd like to explore a bit more :)

@jules32
Copy link
Contributor

jules32 commented Jul 30, 2025

I think framing it as sustainability+funding and growing the contributor community would be stronger (although indeed it was fun)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants