-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 133
Create esip-funding-friday-song-lyrics.md #1056
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
I will automatically update this comment whenever this PR is modified
|
esip-funding-friday-song-lyrics.md
Outdated
| In 2025 Seattle, we won $5K for our idea! This is a short way to document what we did, and to credit non-traditional contributors and contributions. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Brief timeline | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a visual timeline might be powerful to show just how short a time this took place in .... after the years of work and community that led to this
Wed July 23 at 10am, Julie types in NASA Openscapes Mentors doc:
What’s a small something/Earthaccess feature to pitch at ESIP :) Julie thinking of proposing: “piloting earthaccess with NOAA data”. Or other ideas?
Synchronous discussion ensued in Julie's absence and was quite technical focusing on datasets that could be used. Amy opened an earthaccess GitHub Discussion.
Thursday night poster-making. "lets's do a song". Powerful pivot to simplicity in the pitch song lyrics: we want to have NASA, NOAA, USGS, Copernicus data in our hands! (implicit: open science for all!).
Friday 15mins before Friday pitch time, Kate Wing, affiliation and singer, notices the stanzas of the song aren't quite right and she marks up the sheet and re-writes on bigger paper so all the "performers" can see.
Who is singing/ pitching? Boom!: 4 people, each from NASA, NOAA, Intertidal Agency, and Openscapes. Reflecting: this would absolutely not have happened without hours and years of prior connections, collaborations, trust- and community-building, and sync and async social interactions among these 4 and our collective web of humans. ("Want to build community? Go to other peoples' parties!" Analagous to: learn to understand and contribute to someone else's software before creating your own from scratch)
The Pitch (see what we did there?). Kate gives a "hummmmm" to start everyone on the right note then uses her finger like a bouncing lyric ball to guide the group. The fun song transitions to a crystal clear and emphatic ask from Julie: "We will use FUNDing Friday award to ....".
We win!
|
I think we should also link the video here. @jules32, what do you think? |
|
Great minds! Yes I have more edits to make, it's still a draft PR :) |
|
OK I think it's all set as a PR; I put it in a folder but likely not the best place or name so please feel free to move/rename :) Also linking to the discussion: #1054 |
|
I think this should live within the docs website. Nobody will see it if it's just in the repo! I think it's a good piece of evidence that this is a fun community to join. Maybe we should have a "this is a fun project"-type directory in the docs? Perhaps under "work with us"? Other ideas? |
|
I like that idea @mfisher87 , I agree it needs visibility by being part of the website, not the GitHub repo. Wherever you think best! Thank you! |
|
Any ideas for how we might name this page / potential future group of pages? "This is a fun project" under "work with us" may be fine, but I'd like to explore a bit more :) |
|
I think framing it as sustainability+funding and growing the contributor community would be stronger (although indeed it was fun) |
Pull Request (PR) draft checklist - click to expand
contributing documentation
before getting started.
title such as "Add testing details to the contributor section of the README".
Example PRs: #763
example
closes #1. SeeGitHub docs - Linking a pull request to an issue.
CHANGELOG.mdwith details about your change in a section titled## Unreleased. If such a section does not exist, please create one. FollowCommon Changelog for your additions.
Example PRs: #763
README.mdwith details of changes to theearthaccess interface, if any. Consider new environment variables, function names,
decorators, etc.
Click the "Ready for review" button at the bottom of the "Conversation" tab in GitHub
once these requirements are fulfilled. Don't worry if you see any test failures in
GitHub at this point!
Pull Request (PR) merge checklist - click to expand
Please do your best to complete these requirements! If you need help with any of these
requirements, you can ping the
@nsidc/earthaccess-supportteam in a comment and wewill help you out!
Request containing "pre-commit.ci autofix" to automate this.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://earthaccess--1056.org.readthedocs.build/en/1056/