Skip to content

Conversation

@selfissued
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #31

Copy link
Collaborator

@yaronf yaronf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I disagree with the premise here: the BCP formally Updates 7519 (and would Update 7516 if we asked for it), and so I don't think we are committed to retain every last feature if we believe it raises security issues.

We are pointing out a security problem with systems and libraries, and I don't think the position "SHOULD NOT compress but still MUST support zip" is consistent.

@selfissued
Copy link
Collaborator Author

selfissued commented Dec 21, 2025

Actually, the BCP doesn't update JWE [RFC 7516]. It's not within our remit to make breaking changes to a spec in another working group. That would need to be done by new spec work in the JOSE working group, with consensus of that working group. It is within our scope to recommend that problematic features not be used.

@dickhardt
Copy link
Collaborator

Checking in on where we are at on this. The updates look good to me. @bc-pi now is the time to make any additional suggestions!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Brian's WGLC comment - compression

4 participants