Update README.md with DSL

[pauljones0]

Added Double Shot Latte to the readme

Motivation and Context

I read the blog post here and realized DSL was missing from the readme.

How Has This Been Tested?

Not at all, but I was able to use the bash command without issue.

Breaking Changes

None

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• [ x] Documentation update

Checklist

• [ x] I have read the MCP Documentation
• [x ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
• [ x] New and existing tests pass locally
• [x ] I have added appropriate error handling
• [ x] I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added "Double Shot Latte" plugin to the marketplace listing with description, installation command, delivered features, and a usage note; entry added to the README marketplace section.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A new "Double Shot Latte" plugin entry was added to the README marketplace listing, including description, categories, an install command, delivered features, and a usage note, inserted before the Marketplace Structure section.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Plugin marketplace documentation README.md	Added a new "Double Shot Latte" plugin block with description, category tags, npm install command, delivered features list, and a usage note; inserted before the Marketplace Structure section.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

• Simple, self-contained documentation addition following existing patterns.
• No code, manifests, or exported declarations were changed.

Poem

I hopped to the README with a twitch of my whisker,
Brought Double Shot Latte — a plugin to whisker,
Beans doubled, commands neat and sweet,
Market shelf warmed, a caffeinated treat. 🐰☕️

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'Update README.md with DSL' is partially related to the changeset. It mentions a file (README.md) and acronym (DSL), but lacks specificity about what 'DSL' refers to and what the actual change is. The vague reference to 'DSL' without context doesn't clearly communicate that a new plugin entry 'Double Shot Latte' was added.	Clarify the title to be more specific about the change, such as 'Add Double Shot Latte plugin to README marketplace' or 'Add DSL plugin entry to README marketplace' to better convey the primary change.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e226d97 and 82611c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

95-95: Minor: Fix bare URL formatting to comply with markdown best practices.

The static analysis tool flags line 95 for a bare URL (MD034 no-bare-urls rule). While other repository links in the file use the same format, consider wrapping the URL in angle brackets for consistency with markdown standards:

-**Repository:** https://github.com/obra/double-shot-latte
+**Repository:** <https://github.com/obra/double-shot-latte>

Alternatively, if this bare URL format is an intentional style choice for your repository, you may safely ignore this suggestion.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82611c4 and 99f3478.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

README.md

95-95: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

README.md (1)

78-97: Well-structured entry that maintains consistency with existing plugins.

The "Double Shot Latte" entry is clearly written, follows the established format, and integrates seamlessly with other marketplace listings. The past review concern about the missing Repository link has been addressed (line 95).