rtmp-services: add Streamplace

[iameli]

Description

• Added Streamplace as a service in OBS. (The first WHIP service!)
• This will fail on CI and segfault when built until rtmp-services: Fix bugs blocking WHIP services #12033 lands.

Motivation and Context

We're making Streamplace, live video on Bluesky's AT Protocol! We were in a TechCrunch article last week woo! We're aiming to build a decentralized alternative to Twitch.

Checklist:

• My code has been run through clang-format.
• I have read the contributing document.
• My code is not on the master branch.
• The code has been tested.
• All commit messages are properly formatted and commits squashed where appropriate.
• I have included updates to all appropriate documentation.

[Sean-Der]

So exciting! When this lands we should get more WHIP services in

[WizardCM]

The new service and the bug fix in this PR should be reviewed independently. Please split them into separate PRs.

[iameli]

@WizardCM Certainly — this PR now adds Streamplace, #12033 fixes support for WHIP services.

[gxalpha]

Converting to draft to prevent accidental merges as per the description:

• This will fail on CI and segfault when built until rtmp-services: Fix bugs blocking WHIP services #12033 lands.

[Fenrirthviti]

Unfortunately, after two weeks of monitoring this does not meet our minimum adoption requirements for being listed in the main services list.

Please feel free to resubmit once this has gained more momentum.

[iameli]

Unfortunately, after two weeks of monitoring this does not meet our minimum adoption requirements for being listed in the main services list.

Please feel free to resubmit once this has gained more momentum.

@Fenrirthviti Alright, though this PR never made it out of the draft stage. Could we keep this open as a draft until we're ready to submit? That guide says:

You may submit a PR in draft stage before release for review and to accelerate merge once your service becomes available

[Fenrirthviti]

I'd prefer not to keep a draft open for a service that is currently showing no adoption, as it implies it is still under consideration to be merged. It was my understanding this was marked draft because it was pending a separate fix (which is still pending, but something that we are interested in fixing), not because the service wasn't launched.

Once there is a level of adoption that warrants inclusion in OBS as a listed service, we can either re-open this or you can submit a new PR.