Skip to content

Conversation

@anarchivist
Copy link

Thanks again for all the hard work of the Octopress team!

@anarchivist
Copy link
Author

Updating the build matrix fixed this; I'm happy to use a different set of Ruby versions if you'd prefer. I decided to abandon support for Ruby 1.9.3 since I saw that the core Octopress gem did the same.

@jalcine
Copy link

jalcine commented Feb 27, 2016

This is a big blocker for me. What about Jekyll 3 is making this a hazardous merge to encourage?

@atkinsam
Copy link

@jalcine Also a blocker for me... 8 months later. is anything holding this back?

@elbowdonkey
Copy link

elbowdonkey commented Nov 17, 2016

Any reason why this hasn't been merged? Out of the 12 or so octopress plugins I use, this is the only one that hasn't been updated to allow Jekyll 3.0.

@drkpxl
Copy link

drkpxl commented Mar 22, 2017

Any reason this can't get updated?

@olea olea mentioned this pull request Dec 28, 2017
@glynhudson
Copy link

Please merge this

@jalcine
Copy link

jalcine commented Mar 3, 2020

If merging doesn't work for people; y'all can target the fork's repo as well as the SHA/branch it's on. It's shoddy but will work in the interim.

@forresthopkinsa
Copy link

gem "octopress-video-tag", git: "https://github.com/anarchivist/octopress-video-tag.git", branch: "loosen-gemspec"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants