Skip to content

Conversation

hsxyl
Copy link
Collaborator

@hsxyl hsxyl commented Jun 23, 2025

No description provided.

@hsxyl hsxyl requested review from Copilot and en June 23, 2025 12:52
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR introduces a guard mechanism to prevent concurrent transaction execution by tracking executing pools.

  • Adds an ExecuteTxGuard struct in utils.rs with a Drop implementation for cleanup.
  • Extends state.rs with an executing_pools field to maintain a set of active pools.
  • Uses the guard in canister.rs to enforce transactional exclusivity.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
ree-cookie-canister/src/utils.rs Introduces ExecuteTxGuard with a new guard and Drop pattern.
ree-cookie-canister/src/state.rs Adds an executing_pools field to track active executor pools.
ree-cookie-canister/src/canister.rs Applies ExecuteTxGuard in execute_tx() to prevent duplicate execution.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

ree-cookie-canister/src/canister.rs:295

  • [nitpick] The error message 'Pool {0} Executing' could be made more descriptive (e.g., 'Transaction already executing for pool {0}') to improve clarity for API consumers.
    .ok_or(format!("Pool {0} Executing", pool_address).to_string())?;

pub fn new(pool_address: String) -> Option<Self> {
mutate_state( |s| {
if s.executing_pools.contains(&pool_address) {
return None::<ExecuteTxGuard>;
Copy link

Copilot AI Jun 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] The explicit type annotation in 'return None::' may be redundant; consider simplifying the return statement to 'None' for clarity.

Suggested change
return None::<ExecuteTxGuard>;
return None;

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants