Skip to content

Conversation

@kkaname
Copy link

@kkaname kkaname commented Dec 9, 2025

…e relational operators.

As per asked in the excercise question, I have implemented the loop using while loop and break statement without using any relational operator(&& and ||).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified loop control for clearer input processing
    • Improved end-of-input handling to ensure consistent trailing newline output
    • Streamlined character accumulation and branching for more readable flow

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

…e relational operators.

As per asked in the excercise question, I have implemented the loop using while loop and break statement without using any relational operator(&& and ||).
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Walkthrough

A loop control structure refactoring in a single exercise file. Replaced conditional-based loop logic with a while(1) infinite loop containing explicit break conditions for EOF, newline, and buffer limit scenarios, and restructured input accumulation using else-if branching.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Loop structure refactoring
chapter_2/exercise_2_02/loop.c
Replaced previous loop control flow with while(1) and added explicit break conditions for EOF, newline, and MAXLINE-1 buffer limit. Introduced local c and i, moved getchar() into the loop, reworked input accumulation with if/else if branches, and ensured output prints the accumulated string followed by a newline (prints newline on EOF).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Single-file change localized to loop.c
  • Straightforward loop refactor and input handling adjustments
  • Check boundary condition for MAXLINE-1 and correct handling of EOF/newline

Poem

While loops spin in circles wide,
Breaking free with newfound pride,
EOF tiptoes, newlines sing,
A rabbit taps the keyboard—ping! 🐇🔁

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: implementing a loop for reading input into a string while avoiding relational operators, which directly matches the PR's core objective and the changes in loop.c.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fb49ce7 and 603ddad.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • chapter_2/exercise_2_02/loop.c (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
chapter_2/exercise_2_02/loop.c (1)

7-7: Critical issue fixed: EOF detection now works correctly.

The variable shadowing issue has been resolved. Line 7 properly declares int c and line 20 now assigns to it without redeclaring, ensuring EOF detection works reliably.

Also applies to: 20-20


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
chapter_2/exercise_2_02/loop.c (1)

9-13: Optional: Consider removing commented-out code.

The commented code from the previous implementation provides useful context but could be removed for cleaner code. The NOTE at lines 40-45 already explains the multiplication approach.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 396a2cd and fb49ce7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • chapter_2/exercise_2_02/loop.c (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
chapter_2/exercise_2_02/loop.c (1)

15-31: Implementation successfully avoids relational operators, but needs fixes.

The while(1) loop with separate break conditions successfully avoids using && and || operators as required by the exercise. The buffer overflow protection logic (lines 16-18) is correct.

However, the critical bug on line 20 must be fixed before this implementation is correct.

Comment on lines +25 to +28
else if (c == EOF){
printf("\n");
break;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Questionable: Extra newline printed on EOF.

Lines 25-28 print a newline when EOF is encountered, but not for other exit conditions (newline or buffer full). This creates inconsistent output behavior.

Consider whether this extra newline is necessary or if EOF should be handled like the newline case (just break).

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In chapter_2/exercise_2_02/loop.c around lines 25 to 28, the code prints an
extra newline when c == EOF which causes inconsistent output compared to other
exit conditions; remove the printf("\n") so EOF is handled the same as the
newline/buffer-full cases (just break), or restructure the branch to break
immediately on EOF without emitting any characters.

@kkaname
Copy link
Author

kkaname commented Dec 9, 2025

@ohkimur So i have implemented the new changes, and as per you said earlier you can merge the file.
Also i have tested the code, it runs as intened, so no issues with it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant