Skip to content

chore: fix struct name in comment - #933

Merged
m-Peter merged 2 commits into
onflow:mainfrom
changgesi:main
Dec 15, 2025
Merged

chore: fix struct name in comment#933
m-Peter merged 2 commits into
onflow:mainfrom
changgesi:main

Conversation

@changgesi

@changgesi changgesi commented Dec 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes: #???

Description

fix struct name in comment


For contributor use:

  • Targeted PR against master branch
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the standards mentioned here.
  • Updated relevant documentation
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Added appropriate labels

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated internal documentation for consistency.

Note: This release contains no user-facing changes—only minor internal documentation improvements.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Signed-off-by: changgesi <changgesi@outlook.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Walkthrough

A comment header in api/pull.go is updated for consistency, changing "transactionFilter" to "transactionsFilter" to accurately reflect the actual type name referenced in the code.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Comment update
api/pull.go
Updated header comment from "transactionFilter" to "transactionsFilter" to align with the actual type name

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Poem

A comment was quietly set right,
No logic broke, all working bright,
Just words aligned with what they mean,
The clearest code you've ever seen! 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: fixing a struct name reference in a comment from 'transactionFilter' to 'transactionsFilter'.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bbeb971 and f94fa37.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • api/pull.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
api/pull.go (1)

94-94: Comment now correctly reflects the struct name.

The comment has been updated from "transactionFilter" to "transactionsFilter" to match the actual struct definition on line 98. The change improves consistency and clarity in the codebase.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@m-Peter m-Peter left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thank you!

@m-Peter
m-Peter merged commit 3bf353e into onflow:main Dec 15, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants