Skip to content

fix: progressive sync for applicationSet needs to evaluate more application status fields #126

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

mikeshng
Copy link
Member

  • I have taken backward compatibility into consideration.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 26, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mikeshng

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mikeshng mikeshng changed the title WIP - fix: progressive sync for applicationSet needs to evaluate more application status fields fix: progressive sync for applicationSet needs to evaluate more application status fields Apr 27, 2025
@mikeshng mikeshng requested a review from xiangjingli April 27, 2025 01:56
@mikeshng
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @xiangjingli

@xiangjingli
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Apr 28, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (f485c02) to head (048b3d3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@     Coverage Diff     @@
##   main   #126   +/-   ##
===========================
===========================

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 7b6cb0c into open-cluster-management-io:main Apr 28, 2025
9 checks passed
@mikeshng mikeshng deleted the progressive-sync branch April 28, 2025 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants