Skip to content

✨ add CEL cost estimator #114

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

haoqing0110
Copy link
Member

@haoqing0110 haoqing0110 commented Apr 22, 2025

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and qiujian16 April 22, 2025 03:12
@haoqing0110 haoqing0110 changed the title WIP ✨ add CEL cost estimator ✨ add CEL cost estimator Apr 24, 2025
@haoqing0110
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @qiujian16 @zhujian7

@qiujian16
Copy link
Member

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 25, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: haoqing0110, qiujian16

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Signed-off-by: Qing Hao <[email protected]>
if cost := k8sEstimator.CallCost(function, overloadId, args, result); cost != nil {
return cost
}
return b.CostEstimator.CallCost(function, overloadId, args, result)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not famillar with the CostEstimator, want to understand who is expected to assign value for the BaseEnvCostEstimator.CostEstimator? should we add the nil check for the b.CostEstimator?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants