refac: add docs for running on ZIB cluster

[measrainsey]

(wip)

This PR addresses parts of #637 and builds on #820.

Closes:

• [SUB] Add documentation for high resolution remote runs #819

Changes proposed in this Pull Request

Tasks

Workflow

Open issues

Notes

Checklist

• I tested my contribution locally and it works as intended.
• Code and workflow changes are sufficiently documented.
• Changed dependencies are added to pixi.toml (using pixi add <dependency-name>).
• Changes in configuration options are added in config/config.default.yaml.
• Changes in configuration options are documented in doc/configtables/*.csv.
• Changes in configuration options are added in config/test/*.yaml.
• The multiple weather/climate years test is passing locally (using pixi run -e open-tyndp tyndp-cyears-test).
• Open-TYNDP SPDX license header added to all touched files.
• For new data sources or versions, these instructions have been followed.
• New rules are documented in the appropriate doc/*.rst files.
• A release note doc/release_notes.rst is added.
• Major features are documented with up-to-date information in README and doc/index.rst.
• Module docstrings added to new Python scripts.

[daniel-rdt]

@measrainsey I created a different PR that adds the custom slurm profile and a configuration overwrite file for HPC remote runs config/config.hpc.yaml. I changed the base of this PR to the other PR. I would suggest that we remove the config.zib.yaml from this PR as it is consolidated in the other one now. Instead let's build on top of that one here by adding this fix for the solve_cba_network.py script and some bit of additional documentation to the docs.

Let me know what you think :)

[measrainsey]

@measrainsey I created a different PR that adds the custom slurm profile and a configuration overwrite file for HPC remote runs config/config.hpc.yaml. I changed the base of this PR to the other PR. I would suggest that we remove the config.zib.yaml from this PR as it is consolidated in the other one now. Instead let's build on top of that one here by adding this fix for the solve_cba_network.py script and some bit of additional documentation to the docs.

Let me know what you think :)

Thanks @daniel-rdt for picking this back up again and starting the new PR! I would be happy to move forward with your new PR as suggested. One thing to not is the "fix" to solve_cba_network was actually implemented (in a better way) in another PR #756 so actually we can remove the "fix" in this branch. In which case, all that would remain is the docs I think.