Skip to content

Feat/762 update docs soften warning - #817

Open
lisazeyen wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
feat/762-update-docs-soften-warning
Open

Feat/762 update docs soften warning#817
lisazeyen wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
feat/762-update-docs-soften-warning

Conversation

@lisazeyen

@lisazeyen lisazeyen commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes # (if applicable).
#762

Changes proposed in this Pull Request

  • fixed typo in URL docs
  • rename Open TYNDP -> Open-TYNDP
  • updated warning in readme aligned to statement in docs

Tasks

Workflow

Open issues

Notes

Checklist

Required:

  • Security scans show no high-severity bugs, critical vulnerabilities, or exposed secrets.
  • Changes are tested locally and behave as expected.
  • Code and workflow changes are documented.
  • A release note entry is added to doc/release_notes.md.
  • The description is human-written and any AI-generated content is marked.

@lisazeyen lisazeyen self-assigned this Jul 30, 2026
@lisazeyen
lisazeyen requested a review from tgilon July 30, 2026 15:31

@tgilon tgilon left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @lisazeyen for the documentation effort! I would like to align the warnings slightly more precisely. Could you ensure that they are exactly the same? There are 4 identical warnings: two in the README and two in the index.md. Additionally, I found two other mentions of "Open TYNDP" in the release notes. Perhaps you could fix these too.

Comment thread README.md
# Development status

**Warning**: Open-TYNDP is under active development and is not yet feature-complete. The current [development status](https://open-tyndp.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#development-status) and general [Limitations](https://open-tyndp.readthedocs.io/en/latest/limitations.html) are important to understand before using the model. The model includes partial data from the TYNDP 2024 cycle, and its validation is ongoing. The github repository [issues](https://github.com/open-energy-transition/open-tyndp/issues) collect known topics we are working on (please feel free to help or make suggestions). The fact that this project relies on a soft-fork strategy implies that [upstream issues](https://github.com/PyPSA/PyPSA-Eur/issues) need to be addressed in the PyPSA-Eur repository. The [documentation](https://open-tyndp.readthedocs.io/) also remains work in progress.
**Warning**: Open-TYNDP is under active development and is not yet feature-complete. The current [development status](https://open-tyndp.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#development-status) and general [Limitations](https://open-tyndp.readthedocs.io/en/latest/limitations.html) are important to understand before using the model. Benchmarking against the TYNDP 2024 cycle is complete, and development is now moving forward to align with the TYNDP 2026 cycle. The GitHub repository's [issues](https://github.com/open-energy-transition/open-tyndp/issues) collect known topics we are working on (please feel free to help or make suggestions). The fact that this project relies on a soft-fork strategy implies that [upstream issues](https://github.com/PyPSA/PyPSA-Eur/issues) need to be addressed in the PyPSA-Eur repository. The [documentation](https://open-tyndp.readthedocs.io/) also remains work in progress.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you make sure that the warnings in the README say exactly the same thing? Currently, one of the two links to the website and the other one introduces TYNDP 2026. The wording is slightly different too.

Comment thread doc/index.md

!!! warning
Open-TYNDP is under active development and is not yet feature-complete. As of v0.7, Open TYNDP was successfully benchmarked against TYNDP 2024 (see [results](https://open-tyndp.openenergytransition.org)). The current [development status](#development-status) and the general [Limitations](limitations.md) are important to understand before using the model.
Open-TYNDP is under active development and is not yet feature-complete. As of v0.7, Open-TYNDP was successfully benchmarked against TYNDP 2024 (see [results](https://open-tyndp.openenergytransition.org)). The current [development status](#development-status) and the general [Limitations](limitations.md) are important to understand before using the model.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here, could you please ensure that the warning is exactly the same in both locations and in the README?

Comment thread doc/benchmarking.md
and the general [Limitations](limitations.md)
are important to understand before using the model. The following outputs are presented
for illustrative purposes and do not reflect the quality of the results.
Open-TYNDP is under active development and is not yet feature-complete. As of v0.7, Open-TYNDP was successfully benchmarked against TYNDP 2024 (see [results](https://open-tyndp.openenergytransition.org)). The current [development status](index.md#development-status) and the general [Limitations](limitations.md) are important to understand before using the model.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Open-TYNDP is under active development and is not yet feature-complete. As of v0.7, Open-TYNDP was successfully benchmarked against TYNDP 2024 (see [results](https://open-tyndp.openenergytransition.org)). The current [development status](index.md#development-status) and the general [Limitations](limitations.md) are important to understand before using the model.
Open-TYNDP is under active development and is not yet feature-complete. As of v0.7, Open-TYNDP was successfully benchmarked against TYNDP 2024 (see [outcomes](https://open-tyndp.openenergytransition.org)). The current [development status](index.md#development-status) and the general [Limitations](limitations.md) are important to understand before using the model.

??? question "When will Open-TYNDP be ready?"

The project is currently back-casting the 2024 TYNDP cycle to build confidence before aligning with the 2026 TYNDP cycle in Q2 2026. The [development status](index.md#development-status) page provides a detailed roadmap of implemented and planned features.
Benchmarking of the 2024 NT (National Trends) scenario is complete, giving us confidence in the model's outcomes. We are now moving forward with development to align with the 2026 TYNDP cycle. The [development status](index.md#development-status) page provides a detailed roadmap of implemented and planned features.s

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Benchmarking of the 2024 NT (National Trends) scenario is complete, giving us confidence in the model's outcomes. We are now moving forward with development to align with the 2026 TYNDP cycle. The [development status](index.md#development-status) page provides a detailed roadmap of implemented and planned features.s
Benchmarking of the 2024 NT (National Trends) scenario is complete, giving us confidence in the model's outcomes. We are now moving forward with development to align with the 2026 TYNDP cycle. The [development status](index.md#development-status) page provides a detailed roadmap of implemented and planned features.

@tgilon tgilon linked an issue Jul 31, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
3 tasks
@tgilon tgilon mentioned this pull request Jul 31, 2026
29 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update documentation to soften warnings about active development status

2 participants