chore: discourage go install, update links

[toddbaert]

• Discourages use of go install (see note in PR)
• fixes some links

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for polite-licorice-3db33c ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	f23ffc1
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/polite-licorice-3db33c/deploys/6900d2243bd34900087d6a7e
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1817--polite-licorice-3db33c.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @toddbaert, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the project's documentation by updating installation instructions to discourage go install in favor of official binary releases, correcting outdated links, and making minor adjustments to API specification documentation, including deprecating a response and adding a new field for sync context. The changes aim to improve clarity and accuracy for users.

Highlights

• Installation Guidance Update: The documentation now explicitly discourages the use of go install for flagd due to potential issues with local workspace modules, recommending official binary releases instead.
• Documentation Link Corrections: Several links within the documentation have been updated, including a general release link and specific schema references for flag configurations.
• API Specification Changes: The GetMetadataResponse has been marked as deprecated, with a recommendation to use flagd.sync.v1.SyncFlagsResponse.sync_context, and a new sync_context field has been added to SyncFlagsResponse.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the documentation to discourage using go install and to fix some links. The changes in docs/installation.md are well-explained and correctly remove the outdated installation method. However, docs/reference/specifications/protos.md is being manually edited despite being marked as an auto-generated file. This can lead to the changes being lost. I've added a comment to address this.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud