Skip to content

[WIP] Switch to proxqp#259

Draft
sjahr wants to merge 1 commit into
open-planning:mainfrom
sjahr:pr-switch-from-osqp-to-proxqp
Draft

[WIP] Switch to proxqp#259
sjahr wants to merge 1 commit into
open-planning:mainfrom
sjahr:pr-switch-from-osqp-to-proxqp

Conversation

@sjahr

@sjahr sjahr commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@sjahr
sjahr force-pushed the pr-switch-from-osqp-to-proxqp branch from ce5d8bd to 106028e Compare July 2, 2026 21:06
Comment thread pixi.toml
yaml-cpp = ">=0.8.0,<0.9"

# Core dependencies
# Note: the OInK QP solver (proxsuite/ProxQP, header-only) is fetched at a pinned version

@sea-bass sea-bass Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty sure proxqp is available via conda

Comment on lines +36 to +42
FetchContent_Declare(
proxsuite
URL https://github.com/Simple-Robotics/proxsuite/archive/refs/tags/v0.7.3.tar.gz
URL_HASH SHA256=e634babff534c8812c6dbc6b022b1d01f9a2a4a9a73cf87a6dc299a4de996904
DOWNLOAD_EXTRACT_TIMESTAMP TRUE
)
FetchContent_MakeAvailable(proxsuite)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

proxsuite is available on the ROS buildfarm, why not try use that first? Otherwise the same issues we have with osqpeigen will persist and we won't be able to ship this via binaries

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants