[chore] Add a new ottl function Keys #39256
Open
+128
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jaysonsantos
requested review from
TylerHelmuth,
bogdandrutu,
evan-bradley,
edmocosta and
a team
as code owners
jaysonsantos
force-pushed
the
ottl-add-keys-function
branch
from
9f3ae35 to
b6ad3b8
Compare
jaysonsantos
changed the title
jaysonsantos
force-pushed
the
ottl-add-keys-function
branch
4 times, most recently
from
05667c6 to
0ae2462
Compare
jaysonsantos
force-pushed
the
ottl-add-keys-function
branch
from
0ae2462 to
fa791ee
Compare
This was referenced Apr 15, 2025
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This adds a new ottl function called
KeysThe idea here is because, I have a use case to debug traces being sent to newrelic where some spans are being dropped because of the attribute's names (and they don't specify which). The final idea is to be able to filter out attributes that are bigger than the threshold specified by them and send to a log or something.
A next step would be some sort of filter function like
Filter(Keys(resource.attributes), Len(key) > 100)An ugly implementation of the fiter can be seen here main...jaysonsantos:opentelemetry-collector-contrib:ottl-add-filter-function