Handle profiles in generated component tests

[dmathieu]

We currently don't test profiles in mdatagen code generation.
That's not really an issue so far, as we only have components that support other signals as well.

But with open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-profiler#1075, we try to import consumertest and never use it.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

_{Comparing dmathieu:profiles-generated-component-test (5c37774) with main (17646a7)}

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

Summary

✅ 61 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 20 skipped benchmarks¹

Footnotes

1. 20 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.84%. Comparing base (17646a7) to head (5c37774).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14434      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.85%   91.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         677      677              
  Lines       42680    42692      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits        39203    39212       +9     
- Misses       2423     2425       +2     
- Partials     1054     1055       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[dmathieu]

Contrib tests seem to be failing because they will need to run go mod tidy.

[dmathieu]

Ping for review?