Feat: Aerospike instrumentation

[NimrodAvni78]

Summary

First step in #2531
implement instrumentation for Aerospike Satabase calls.

Important things to mention

• Aerospike currently does not have official or non-official otel instrumentation. and we relied on the general DB semantic conventions. with a new non-existing db.system.name: aerospike
• Protocol detection is currently purely in user-space. only limitations i found currently is that some clients (for example java) receive responses split. first the header and only then the data. in that case we cannot read the status code correctly and assume a failed response is actually a success, we still try to parse the status code for best effort. and kernel side detction and implementation will be implemented in next steps
• db.query.text is populated using the key used for the query. the key is not present in the request if the sendKey WriteOption is not enabled by the client.

All of this is also described in devdocs/protocols/tcp/aerospike.md

Validation

• I have read and followed the contributing guidelines
• If this enhances / fixes / changes a core feature, I have updated the features documentation and support matrix as needed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 63.30275% with 120 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 69.24%. Comparing base (8be3320) to head (e2049b4).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pkg/ebpf/common/aerospike_detect_transform.go	66.22%	61 Missing and 16 partials ⚠️
pkg/appolly/app/request/span.go	34.28%	21 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
pkg/export/otel/tracesgen/tracesgen.go	60.00%	10 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
pkg/appolly/app/request/span_getters.go	40.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
pkg/ebpf/common/tcp_detect_transform.go	85.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
pkg/appolly/app/request/metric_attributes.go	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2545      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.10%   69.24%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         348      350       +2     
  Lines       47380    47842     +462     
==========================================
+ Hits        32740    33130     +390     
- Misses      12589    12641      +52     
- Partials     2051     2071      +20     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration-test	51.07% <55.98%> (-0.07%)	⬇️
integration-test-arm	27.07% <8.56%> (+0.73%)	⬆️
integration-test-vm-5.15-lts	27.74% <7.04%> (-0.22%)	⬇️
integration-test-vm-6.18-lts	26.93% <6.33%> (-0.72%)	⬇️
k8s-integration-test	34.34% <5.98%> (-1.20%)	⬇️
oats-test	35.18% <7.74%> (-0.16%)	⬇️
unittests	63.69% <59.50%> (+0.06%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.