Skip to content

POC: command attributes hook #7210

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

prestonvasquez
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 24.00000% with 19 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.9%. Comparing base (e7ec470) to head (614e6de).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../mongo/otelmongo/internal/semconv/event_monitor.go 33.3% 10 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...mongodb.org/mongo-driver/mongo/otelmongo/config.go 0.0% 4 Missing ⚠️
....mongodb.org/mongo-driver/mongo/otelmongo/mongo.go 0.0% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #7210     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   80.9%   80.9%   -0.1%     
=======================================
  Files        204     204             
  Lines      18030   18051     +21     
=======================================
+ Hits       14604   14606      +2     
- Misses      3007    3023     +16     
- Partials     419     422      +3     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
....mongodb.org/mongo-driver/mongo/otelmongo/mongo.go 86.3% <0.0%> (-3.7%) ⬇️
...mongodb.org/mongo-driver/mongo/otelmongo/config.go 85.7% <0.0%> (-14.3%) ⬇️
.../mongo/otelmongo/internal/semconv/event_monitor.go 87.5% <33.3%> (-12.5%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@prestonvasquez
Copy link
Member Author

@dmathieu Does this change seem reasonable? If so, I will clean it up, add tests, etc, and put it in ready for review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant