Skip to content

Conversation

@otelbot
Copy link
Contributor

@otelbot otelbot bot commented Nov 19, 2025

Update opentelemetry-collector-releases version to v0.140.1.

See https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-releases/releases/tag/v0.140.1.

@otelbot otelbot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 19, 2025 20:17
@otelbot-docs otelbot-docs bot requested review from a team and bogdandrutu and removed request for a team November 19, 2025 20:17
@otelbot-docs otelbot-docs bot requested a review from a team November 19, 2025 22:53
@vitorvasc vitorvasc marked this pull request as draft November 19, 2025 23:04
@vitorvasc
Copy link
Member

Hi @open-telemetry/collector-approvers! Has the v0.140.1 been released? The otelbot opened this PR, but the link checker is failing because of some 404s:

docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html
  fresh --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/component/config.go
  hitting --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/component/config.go
  Non-OK status: 404 --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/component/config.go
  fresh --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/receiver/receiver.go#L58
  hitting --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/receiver/receiver.go#L58
  Non-OK status: 404 --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/receiver/receiver.go#L58
  fresh --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/receiver/receiver.go
  hitting --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/receiver/receiver.go
  Non-OK status: 404 --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/receiver/receiver.go
  fresh --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/pdata/ptrace/generated_resourcespans.go
  hitting --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/pdata/ptrace/generated_resourcespans.go
  Non-OK status: 404 --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/pdata/ptrace/generated_resourcespans.go
  fresh --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/pdata/pcommon/map.go
  hitting --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/pdata/pcommon/map.go
  Non-OK status: 404 --- docs/collector/building/receiver/index.html --> https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/v0.140.1/pdata/pcommon/map.go

By checking the https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector repository directly, the tag v0.140.1 doesn't seem to exist. 🤔

image

Copy link
Member

@songy23 songy23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should be 0.140.0 than 0.140.1

cc @jade-guiton-dd

@chalin
Copy link
Contributor

chalin commented Nov 20, 2025

Right, we've hit this problem before ... a few times. Visit https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-releases/releases/tag/v0.140.1, then visit each of the changelogs. You'll see that the core CL yields a 404.

@tiffany76 - how did we solve this in the past? Did we wait until both releases (contrib and core) were synced on their versions? Do we have an issue open for this already?

If we don't have an issue for this already we should open one. I think that the solution for this repo is to create two versions, one for the contrib and one for the core. Then we'll need to adapt the update script so that it updates only the package version that has actually be changed.

@chalin
Copy link
Contributor

chalin commented Nov 20, 2025

Oh, I didn't pay attention the PR status. I'm glad it hasn't been merged yet. 😅

@tiffany76
Copy link
Member

Yes, we have an outstanding issue. It's a little more complicated than core or contrib because there are other release artifacts as well.

In the meantime, I've just been waiting for the next release bot update where CI passes because the version numbers are uniform. 🤷

@jade-guiton-dd
Copy link
Contributor

jade-guiton-dd commented Nov 21, 2025

I don't think that will happen here unfortunately; see this comment on the release issue. We can't modify tags once they've been pushed in core/contrib because Go relies on them, so if the CI triggered by the tags failed, we have no choice but to up the patch version for that specific repo. So in this case, the version that was released is 0.140.0 for the core source release and prebuilt artifacts, but 0.140.1 for the contrib source release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants