Skip to content

Conversation

@cijothomas
Copy link
Member

Change Summary

Applied suggestion from #1987

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes, less expensive logs, without losing information!

@cijothomas cijothomas requested a review from a team as a code owner February 9, 2026 19:18
@github-actions github-actions bot added the rust Pull requests that update Rust code label Feb 9, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.23%. Comparing base (5cdec9c) to head (5320706).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2005      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.23%   86.23%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         525      525              
  Lines      164810   164812       +2     
==========================================
- Hits       142127   142125       -2     
- Misses      22149    22153       +4     
  Partials      534      534              
Components Coverage Δ
otap-dataflow 88.22% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
query_abstraction 80.61% <ø> (ø)
query_engine 90.23% <ø> (ø)
syslog_cef_receivers ∅ <ø> (∅)
otel-arrow-go 53.50% <ø> (ø)
quiver 92.15% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jmacd jmacd enabled auto-merge February 10, 2026 01:05
@jmacd jmacd added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 10, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Feb 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rust Pull requests that update Rust code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants